BPA Fish and Wildlife FY 1998 Proposal
Section 1. Summary
Section 2. Goals
Section 3. Background
Section 4. Purpose and methods
Section 5. Planned activities
Section 6. Outcomes, monitoring and evaluation
Section 7. Relationships
Section 8. Costs and FTE
see CBFWA and BPA funding recommendations
Section 1. Summary
Title of project
Okanogan Watershed Planning
BPA project number 9502100
Short description
Initial model watershed planning for Okanogan watershed.
Business name of agency, institution or organization requesting funding
Colville Confederated Tribes
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
|
Sub-contractors |
Section 2. Goals
General
Supports a healthy Columbia basin; maintains biological diversity; maintains genetic integrity; increases run sizes or populations; provides needed habitat protection; program coordination or planning
Target stock | Life stage | Mgmt code (see below) |
Summer steelhead | Freshwater | |
Summer chinook | Freshwater | |
Sockeye | Freshwater | |
Spring chinook | Freshwater |
Affected stock | Benefit or detriment |
Resident salmonids | Beneficial |
Resident warmwater fish | Both |
Section 3. Background
Stream area affected
Stream name Okanogan River
Stream miles affected 80
Project is an office site only X
Land ownership Both
Acres affected 5,248,000
History
Contract work did not begin on this project until January '97
Section 4. Purpose and methods
Specific measureable objectives
1) Create an oversight committee of local stakeholders to develop and oversee the implementation of coordinated resource management that will restore and enhance the fish/wildlife resources in the Okanogan River basin, 2) Develop an overview of present watershed conditions that exist in the basin, 3) Identify the desired future conditions of the watershed, 4) Prioritize resource concerns and needs within sub-basins of the watershed.
Critical uncertainties
Is it possible to bring together the local stakeholders in the basin to develop a plan that will improve the health of the watershed?Will model watershed activities improve the anadromous fish resources in the basin?
Biological need
The Okanogan River basin needs a comprehensive resource planning effort to restore and enhance its natural resources. Several of the anadromous fish species that inhabit the river are in a depressed state. Summer steelhead and summer chinook salmon are a low population levels and without some improvement to the health of the river they may become listed under the ESA.
Hypothesis to be tested
The successful completion of actions associated with the objectives identified above will result in improvement to the health of the watershed which will enhance the anadromous fish resource as well.
Methods
A planning approach will be used that focuses on endorsement of the model watershed by all the local entities in the basin. The priority will be to bring together local efforts into an integrated program aimed at restoring depressed stocks of anadromous fish.
Section 5. Planned activities
Constraints or factors that may cause schedule or budget changes
None.
Section 6. Outcomes, monitoring and evaluation
SUMMARY OF EXPECTED OUTCOMES
Contribution toward long-term goal
All anadromous and resident stocks in Okanogan
MONITORING APPROACH
A planning approach will be used that focuses on endorsement of the model watershed by all the local entities in the basin. The priority will be to bring together local efforts into an integrated program aimed at restoring depressed stocks of anadromous fish.
Section 7. Relationships
Related non-BPA project | Relationship |
Okanogan Water Quality Plan/Wash. Dept. of Ecology | Watershed approach to water quality planning |
Mid-Columbia Habitat Conservation Planning process/ Mid-Columbia PUD's | anadromous fish habitat improvement work on Okanogan River |
Opportunities for cooperation
This project, if funded this year, will enhance the Mid-Columbia Habitat Conservation Planning process now being developed. These processes compliment each other.
Section 8. Costs and FTE
1997 Planned $105,000
Future funding needs | Past obligations (incl. 1997 if done) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY97 overhead percent 40%
How does percentage apply to direct costs
[Overhead % not provided so BPA appended older data.] Salaries only
Subcontractor FTE Potential for one-quarter time fte