BPA Fish and Wildlife FY 1998 Proposal
Section 1. Summary
Section 2. Goals
Section 3. Background
Section 4. Purpose and methods
Section 5. Planned activities
Section 6. Outcomes, monitoring and evaluation
Section 7. Relationships
Section 8. Costs and FTE
see CBFWA and BPA funding recommendations
Section 1. Summary
Title of project
Stinkingwater Salmonid Project
BPA project number 9701900
Short description
Business name of agency, institution or organization requesting funding
Burns Paiute Tribe
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
|
Section 2. Goals
General
Target stock | Life stage | Mgmt code (see below) |
Redband trout, wildlife | ||
Redband trout, wildlife |
Section 3. Background
Stream area affected
History
N/A
Biological results achieved
N/A
Project reports and papers
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 1995 Fish Review (SouthwestRegion). Scientific Resources Inc. (Paul Henson) March 16, 1993 11830 SWKerr Parkway Suite 375 Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035 SRI Project Number 92140
Hanson, Mary L. et.al., July 1990, Malheur River Basin Fish management Plan, prepared by ODF&W and a citizen task force.Aquatic Inventory Project: Methods for Stream Habitat Surveys, Researchand Development Section, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, June 1995.
Adaptive management implications
This project will provide valuable knowledge on native salmonidsin the Stinkingwater Creek area along with the development of adaptivemanagement techniques which could be used by both tribal, state, and federalgroups. Through cooperation with federal and state agencies the tribe willdevelop a management strategy consistent and not detrimental to other landowners and managers.
Section 4. Purpose and methods
Critical uncertainties
County, seller and general public might not support project on private land.
Biological need
Redband trout are depressed in some areas of the basin. Some populationshave been isolated due to dams and obstructions. Redband trout are desigted as "Federal Category 2 and State Sensitive, Vulnerable". As indicated in Hanson et.la. (1990) the Middle Fork Malheur, which includes Stinkingwater Creek, needs improvements on fish habitats, and an inventory of fish populations.
Section 5. Planned activities
Constraints or factors that may cause schedule or budget changes
Target species might not take advantage of the area set aside.
Section 6. Outcomes, monitoring and evaluation
SUMMARY OF EXPECTED OUTCOMES
Expected performance of target population or quality change in land area affected
Develop an implementation program/strategy to enhance native salmonids in Stinkingwater Creek, a tributary of the Middle Fork Malheur River. Determine the appropriate mix of riparian plants and creek improvements to enhance native salmonids habitat. Also, determine the appropriate mix of plants that would benefit both redband trout and large migratory game, such as elk.
Section 7. Relationships
Section 8. Costs and FTE
Future funding needs | Past obligations (incl. 1997 if done) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How does percentage apply to direct costs
[Overhead % not provided so BPA appended older data.]