FY07-09 proposal 200206100
Jump to Reviews and Recommendations
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Restore Potlatch R Watershed |
Proposal ID | 200206100 |
Organization | Latah County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) |
Short description | Implementation stage for the Potlatch River Watershed Management Plan with focus on restoration of A-run steelhead spawning and rearing habitat through the implementation of best management practices on private agricultural, forest and range lands. |
Information transfer | Project information will be hosted on supporting agencies websites, site reviews and published summary reports highlighting projects benefits, costs and available monitoring data. |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Contacts
Contact | Organization | |
---|---|---|
Form submitter | ||
Kenneth Stinson | Latah Soil and Water Conservation District | [email protected] |
All assigned contacts | ||
Kenneth Stinson | Latah Soil and Water Conservation District | [email protected] |
Kenneth Stinson | Latah Soil and Water Conservation District | [email protected] |
Kenneth Stinson | Latah Soil and Water Conservation District | [email protected] |
Section 2. Locations
Province / subbasin: Mountain Snake / Clearwater
Latitude | Longitude | Waterbody | Description |
---|---|---|---|
46 37' 5" | 116 46' 5" | Big Bear Creek | Big Bear Creek mouth near Kendrick, Idaho |
46 39' 2" | 116 32' 53" | Cedar Creek | Cedar Creek mouth near Kendrick, Idaho |
46 45' 56" | 116 29' 33" | Corral Creek | Corral Creek mouth near Helmer, Idaho |
46 37' 50" | 116 39' 15" | Little Bear Creek | Little Bear Creek mouth near Kendrick, Idaho |
46 37' 45" | 116 35' 41" | Pine Creek | Pine Creek mouth near Kendrick, Idaho |
46 28' 30" | 116 46' 14" | Potlatch River | Potlatch River mouth near Juliaetta, Idaho. |
Section 3. Focal species
primary: Steelhead Snake River ESUsecondary: Chinook Snake River Fall ESU
secondary: Chinook Snake River Spring/Summer ESU
secondary: Brook Trout
Section 4. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishments |
---|---|
2005 | - Management Plan nears final draft - Additional fish production information incorporated - Additional stream surveys undertaken - Landowner conservation plans developed - Stream flow monitoring continues - Secured non-BPA implementation funds |
2004 | - Management Plan begins technical review - New fish abundance information incorporated - Additional implementation funding secured - Additional stream gauges installed - Additional stream surveys undertaken - Landowner conservation plans develope |
2003 | - Fish survey completed - Data analysis undertaken - Implementation agreement with NRCS signed - Management Plan in early draft stage - Implementation funding secured - Stream gauges installed - Stream surveys undertaken |
2002 | - Developed Technical Advisory Committee - Compiled existing databases - Developed structure and outline for Potlatch River Watershed Management Plan - Fish survey 50% complete - USGS flow gauge installed - Implementation proposals for direct-seeding |
Section 5. Relationships to other projects
Funding source | Related ID | Related title | Relationship |
---|---|---|---|
PCSRF - Idaho | 040 04 CW | Potlatch River Watershed Restoration | Administered by the Latah Soil and Water Conservation District. The primary focus is riparian restoration work within priority steelhead watersheds through the implementation of agricultural and livestock BMPs and riparian restoration. This proposed project will expand on work already underway in priority waterhseds within the Potlatch River watershed. |
Other: Idaho Soil Conservation Commission | WQPA - A23 | Potlatch River Water Quality Improvement Project | Administered by the Latah Soil and Water Conservation District. This project focuses on sediment reduction for CWA 303(d) listed waterbodies within the Potlatch River watershed. The project provides financial assistance to agricultural operators interested in transitioning from conventional tillage to continuous direct seeding systems. |
Other: Idaho DEQ - CWA 319 | 319 - S106 | Potlatch River Water Quality Improvement Project | Administered by the Latah Soil and Water Conservation District. This project focuses on sediment reduction for CWA 303(d) listed waterbodies within the Potlatch River watershed. The project provides financial assistance to agricultural operators interested in transitioning from conventional tillage to continuous direct seeding systems. |
Other: Idaho DEQ - CWA 319 | 319 - S-069 | North Idaho AFO Implementation Project – Phases I & II | Administered by the Latah Soil and Water Conservation District. This project focuses on improving water quality in 303(d) listed waterbodies throughout Clearwater, Idaho, Lewis, Latah and Nez Perce counties. Within the Potlatch River watershed, livestock exclusion fencing and off-site watering projects have been developed on the Potlatch River mainstem, Pine Creek and Big Bear Creek. Additional FY06 funding for this project has been requested from IDEQ. |
Other: Idaho Soil Conservation Commission | WQPA - A15 | North Idaho AFO Implementation Project - Phases I & II | Administered by the Latah Soil and Water Conservation District. This project focuses on improving water quality in 303(d) listed waterbodies throughout Clearwater, Idaho, Lewis, Latah and Nez Perce counties. Within the Potlatch River, livestock exclusion fencing and off-site watering projects have been developed in the Potlatch River mainstem, Pine Creek and Big Bear Creek. |
Other: USDA - Natural Resources Cons. Service | 68-0211-4-96 | CCRP Contribution Agreement | Administered by the Latah Soil and Water Conservation District. This contribution agreement partially funds Latah SWCD's efforts to coordinate, plan and implement riparian restoration efforts within the Potlatch River watershed through USDA's Continuous Conservation Reserve Program (CCRP). |
BPA | 199608600 | Clearwater Focus Program-IDSCC | Administered by the Idaho Soil Conservation Commission. This program assists with the coordination of the Clearwater Subbasin Management Plan. This program provides a conduit to BPA and NWPCC programs and policies. |
PCSRF - Idaho | 027 05 CW | Potlatch River Steelhead Popul | Administered by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Steelhead production surveys are entering their second year in the Big Bear and Little Bear Creek watersheds. This production information will be incorporated into the Potlatch River Watershed Management Plan and the data will be used as a base-line to measure effectiveness of best management practices within these watersheds. |
PCSRF - Idaho | 041 04 CW | Potlatch River Steelhead Popul | Administered by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Steelhead production surveys initiated in the Big Bear and Little Bear Creek watersheds. This production information has been incorporated into the draft Potlatch River Watershed Management Plan and the data will be used as a base-line to measure effectiveness of best management practices within these watersheds. |
Other: USDA - Natural Resources Cons. Service | WHIP | Corral Creek Passage Barrier Removal | An abondoned railroad fill is scheduled for removal in 2006 by the Idaho Department of Lands and Idaho Department of Fish & Game with funding from USDA's Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program Salmon Habitat Restoration Initiative. This barrier blocks steelhead access to 80% of the 14,000 acre watershed. |
Section 6. Biological objectives
Biological objectives | Full description | Associated subbasin plan | Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
A. Implement riparian and upland agricultural BMPs | Implement riparian and upland agricultural best management practices designed to reduce sedimentation, reduce nutrient loading, reduce stream summer temperatures, increase/maintain summer flows and increase riparian habitat complexity. | Clearwater | Objective B/Strategies 2,5 Objective O/Strategy 4 Objective Q/Strategies 1,2,3 Objective S/Strategies 3,4 Objective T/Strategies 3,4 Objective U/Strategies 1,2,3,4,5 Objective BB/Strategies 1,2,3 Objective LL/Strategy 3 Objective QQ/Strategy 2 |
B. Implement pasture and rangeland riparian BMPs | Implement pasture and rangeland best management practices designed to reduce sedimentation, reduce nutrient loading, reduce summer stream temperatures, increase and maintain summer flows, increase riparian habitat complexity and protect functional riparian areas from further degradation by livestock grazing. | Clearwater | Obj. B/Strategy 2,5 Obj. O/Strategy 4 Obj. Q /Strategies 1,2,3 Obj. S/Strategies 3,4 Obj. U/Strategies 1,2,3,4,5 Obj. T/Strategy 3,4 Obj. BB/Strategies 1,2,3 Obj. EE/Strategies 1,2,3 Obj. FF/Strategy 2 Obj. LL/Strategy 3 Obj. QQ/Strategy 2 |
C. Secure alternative non-BPA financial resources | Secure technical and non-BPA financial resources necessary for the implementation of the Potlatch River Watershed Management Plan. | Clearwater | Obj. B/Strategy 2,5 Obj. O/Strategy 4 Obj. Q /Strategies 1,2,3 Obj. S/Strategies 3,4 Obj. U/Strategies 1,2,3,4,5 Obj. T/Strategy 3,4 Obj. BB/Strategies 1,2,3 Obj. EE/Strategies 1,2,3 Obj. FF/Strategy 2 Obj. LL/Strategy 3 Obj. QQ/Strategy 2 |
D. Coordinate barrier removal planning | Planning and design will be coordinated through this project to determine feasibility of barrier modification to allow upstream and downstream migration past an abandoned dam structure on Little Bear Creek. | Clearwater | Objective P/Strategies 1,2 Objective LL/Strategies 1,3 |
E. Coordinate interagency conservation planning | Coordinate interagency conservation planning, including Potlatch Rivers TMDLs, and BMP implementation efforts within the Potlatch River watershed. | Clearwater | Objective B/Strategy 5 Objective S/Strategy 1 Objective T/Strategies 2,4 Objective LL/Strategy 2 Objective MM/Strategies 1,2,3 Objective NN/Strategies 2,3,4 |
F. Monitor riparian habitat and stream flows | Monitor riparian habitat, water quality parameters and stream flows to analyze BMP effectiveness and watershed-scale trends. | Clearwater | Objective B/Strategies 4,7 Objective O/Strategy 7 Objective Q/Strategy 6 Objective S/Strategy 5 Objective T/Strategy 5 Objective U/Strategies 6,7 Objective BB/Strategy 6 Objective EE/Strategy 4 Objective FF/Strategy 5 |
G. Develop landowner/producer information programs | Develop mechanisms to engage and inform landowners and agriculture producers about the conservation issues of concern within the Potlatch River wateshed and the availability of technical and financial resources to assist with the implementation of BMPs. | Clearwater | Objective BB/Strategy 4 Objective LL/Strategy 3 Objective RR/Strategies 1,2,3,4 |
H. Manage and administer BPA contracts | Manage and administer BPA contracts and coordinate these efforts with other programs. | Clearwater | Objective LL/Strategy 2 |
Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)
Work element name | Work element title | Description | Start date | End date | Est budget |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identify and Select Projects | A1 Identify/select sites for agricultural BMPS | Identify a set of preferred sites for BMP implementation within each of the priority tributaries. Identify landowners willing to implement BMPs in priority watersheds. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $21,878 |
Biological objectives A. Implement riparian and upland agricultural BMPs |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Plan | A2 Develop and implement site-specific conservation plans | Develop and implement site-specific conservation plans for BMP implementation. This element includes: plan development, permitting, review and approval by Latah SWCD, project inspections during construction, plan modifications, if needed, and any other landowner/agency assistance needed related to BMP installation. | 3/1/2007 | 9/30/2009 | $72,586 |
Biological objectives A. Implement riparian and upland agricultural BMPs |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | A3 Identify non-BPA alternative funding sources | Identify alternative non-BPA funding sources, if available, for selected BMPs. | 3/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $5,150 |
Biological objectives A. Implement riparian and upland agricultural BMPs |
Metrics * # of acres of planted: 10 |
||||
Increase Instream Habitat Complexity | A4 Implement riparian restoration BMPs | Regenerate riparian areas within agricultural areas through planting of native grasses, shrubs and trees. | 3/1/2007 | 10/31/2009 | $161,001 |
Biological objectives A. Implement riparian and upland agricultural BMPs |
Metrics * # of stream miles treated: 3 |
||||
Practice No-till and Conservation Tillage Systems | A5 Continuous direct seeding systems | Transition 3,000 acres from conventional tillage to continuous direct-seed systems. Landowner/operator contracts for cost-share will be for three years. | 4/1/2007 | 10/31/2009 | $270,000 |
Biological objectives A. Implement riparian and upland agricultural BMPs |
Metrics * # of acres treated: 3000 |
||||
Upland Erosion and Sedimentation Control | A6 Erosion/Sediment Control Structures | Construct 5 erosion/sediment control structures per year. | 6/1/2007 | 10/31/2009 | $45,000 |
Biological objectives A. Implement riparian and upland agricultural BMPs |
Metrics * # of acres treated: 75 |
||||
Identify and Select Projects | B1 Identify and select sites for pasture and rangeland BMPs | Potential restoration sites will be identified and willing landowners will be selected. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $21,878 |
Biological objectives B. Implement pasture and rangeland riparian BMPs |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Plan | B2 Develop and implement site-specific conservation plans | Develop and implement site-specific conservation plans for BMP implementation. This element includes: plan development, permitting, review and approval by Latah SWCD, project inspections during construction, plan modifications, if needed, and any other landowner/agency assistance needed related to BMP installation. | 3/1/2007 | 6/30/2009 | $46,797 |
Biological objectives B. Implement pasture and rangeland riparian BMPs |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | B3 Identify non-BPA alternative funding sources | Identify alternative funding from non-BPA sources, if available, to implement the planned set of BMPs. | 3/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $7,150 |
Biological objectives B. Implement pasture and rangeland riparian BMPs |
Metrics |
||||
Install Fence | B4 Install livestock exclusoin fencing | Install fencing to exclude livestock access to streams and rivers. | 5/1/2007 | 11/30/2009 | $79,200 |
Biological objectives B. Implement pasture and rangeland riparian BMPs |
Metrics * # of miles of fence: 6.0 |
||||
Develop Alternative Water Source | B5 Livestock off-site water developments | Off-site water developments may include wells, sping developments, etc. | 6/1/2007 | 10/31/2009 | $60,000 |
Biological objectives B. Implement pasture and rangeland riparian BMPs |
Metrics |
||||
Increase Instream Habitat Complexity | B6 Implement riparian restoration BMPs | Riparian plantings along streams recently fenced to exclude livestock | 3/1/2007 | 11/30/2009 | $161,002 |
Biological objectives B. Implement pasture and rangeland riparian BMPs |
Metrics * # of stream miles treated: 3 |
||||
Identify and Select Projects | C1 Identify and select sites for agricultural, pasture and/or rangeland BMPS | Identify and select potential project sites and coordinate with willing landowners to initiate the conservation planning process on their property. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $26,883 |
Biological objectives C. Secure alternative non-BPA financial resources |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Plan | C2 Develop site-specific conservation plan for non-BPA funding | Develop site-specific conservation plans for non-BPA funding sources. | 5/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $21,503 |
Biological objectives C. Secure alternative non-BPA financial resources |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Plan | C3 Solict alternative funding for BMP implementation | Solicit alternative funding for BMP implementation, when appropriate. | 5/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $61,630 |
Biological objectives C. Secure alternative non-BPA financial resources |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | D1 Coordinate technical and community review of possible barrier removal options | Discuss passage options with current owners of the facility, adjacent and upland landowners and partner agencies with appropriate technical expertise. | 6/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $23,608 |
Biological objectives D. Coordinate barrier removal planning |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | D2 Solict funding for passage barrier planning and design | If feasible, solicit technical and financial assistance to initiate planning, design and permitting phases. | 7/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $22,760 |
Biological objectives D. Coordinate barrier removal planning |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Design and/or Specifications | D3 Coordinate implementation funding for passage barrier removal | If the planning and design phase is funded, coordinate the completion of designs to address the passage barrier and coordinate an application for implementation funding assistance for submittal to various funding agencies. | 7/1/2008 | 12/31/2009 | $5,043 |
Biological objectives D. Coordinate barrier removal planning |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | E1 Coordinate the technical advisory group for the Potlatch River Watershed Management Plan | Continue coordination role with the Technical Advisory Group formed to draft the Potlatch River Watershed Management Plan. Use this mechanism to coordinate interagency efforts to identify, prioritize and implement conservation practices to address limiting factors within the Potlatch River watershed. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $15,228 |
Biological objectives E. Coordinate interagency conservation planning |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | E2 Participate on the Potlatch River TMDL Watershed Advisory Group | Participate as an active member of the Potlatch River TMDL Watershed Advisory Group once formed by IDEQ. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $7,984 |
Biological objectives E. Coordinate interagency conservation planning |
Metrics |
||||
Provide Technical Review | E3 Review Potlatch River TMDL and associated implementation plan | Provide technical assistance to the development of the Potlatch River TMDL, and associated implementation plan(s), as water quality parameters of concern to steelhead spawning and rearing habitat are addressed. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $17,215 |
Biological objectives E. Coordinate interagency conservation planning |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | E4 Continue participation on the Clearwater Policy Advisory Group | Continue to participate on the Clearwater Policy Advisory Committee as an alternate to the Idaho Association of Soil Conservation Districts. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $12,878 |
Biological objectives E. Coordinate interagency conservation planning |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | E5 Participate on interagency planning and assessment committees/workgroups | Participate on interagency planning and assessment committees/workgroups to identify, prioritize and fill data gaps, undertake watershed-scale assessments, undertake economic/social impact assessments, and review implementation options/priorities for natural resources issues within the Potlatch River and lower Clearwater watersheds. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $14,396 |
Biological objectives E. Coordinate interagency conservation planning |
Metrics |
||||
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | F1 Undertake BMP effectiveness monitoring | Monitor selected restoration sites before and after BMP installation. | 3/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $70,761 |
Biological objectives F. Monitor riparian habitat and stream flows |
Metrics Primary R, M, and E Type: Action Effectiveness Research |
||||
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | F2 Maintain temperature and flow gauging stations throughout watershed | Maintain the temperature and flow gauging stations in select tributaries and the USGS station at the mouth of the Potlatch River. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $96,317 |
Biological objectives F. Monitor riparian habitat and stream flows |
Metrics Focal Area: Potlatch River Flow Measurements |
||||
Create/Manage/Maintain Database | F3 Maintain data from stream gauging stations | Produce and maintain stream temperature and flow data in a format useful for future analysis. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $9,874 |
Biological objectives F. Monitor riparian habitat and stream flows |
Metrics |
||||
Outreach and Education | G1 Inform potential participants of restoration program funding | Inform potential project participants of the availability of technical and financial BMP assistance through landowner and land user meetings, TMDL watershed advisory groups, agency newsletters, and through established web sites and email networks of agencies and local conservation organizations. | 3/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $13,304 |
Biological objectives G. Develop landowner/producer information programs |
Metrics * # of general public reached: 500 |
||||
Outreach and Education | G2 Communicate project outcomes to the public | Communicate project processes and outcomes to the general public and landuser groups. | 7/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $17,403 |
Biological objectives G. Develop landowner/producer information programs |
Metrics * # of general public reached: 1000 |
||||
Outreach and Education | G3 Undertake field tours | Complete tours for landowners and agricultural producers when individual projects are complete. | 6/1/2007 | 11/30/2009 | $17,086 |
Biological objectives G. Develop landowner/producer information programs |
Metrics * # of general public reached: 80 |
||||
Outreach and Education | G4 Participate in local and regional seminars/conferences | Participate in local and regional workshops to provide information regarding project highlights, current federal and state agency processes and opportunities for technical and financial assistance. | 8/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $9,298 |
Biological objectives G. Develop landowner/producer information programs |
Metrics * # of general public reached: 70 |
||||
Manage and Administer Projects | H1 Manage and administer BPA contract | Administer BPA contract per contract requirements, Latah SWCD accounting procedures and related State of Idaho requirements for state agencies. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $29,245 |
Biological objectives H. Manage and administer BPA contracts |
Metrics |
Section 8. Budgets
Itemized estimated budget
Item | Note | FY07 | FY08 | FY09 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Personnel | Project Manager (0.65 FTE) | $33,000 | $34,500 | $36,200 |
Personnel | Resource Conservation Planner (1.0 FTE) | $47,000 | $49,500 | $52,000 |
Personnel | Assistant Resource Conservation Planner (1.0 FTE) | $34,000 | $35,700 | $37,500 |
Fringe Benefits | All project staff | $40,000 | $42,000 | $44,000 |
Travel | Airfare | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
Travel | Lodging/Per Diem | $2,150 | $2,150 | $2,150 |
Travel | Mileage | $7,788 | $7,788 | $7,788 |
Supplies | Office/Computer Supplies | $5,250 | $5,250 | $5,250 |
Supplies | General Field Supplies | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
Supplies | Monitoring Supplies | $12,500 | $12,500 | $12,500 |
Other | Storage Rental | $900 | $900 | $900 |
Other | Repair and Maintenance | $750 | $750 | $750 |
Other | Cell Phones/Internet Service | $2,100 | $2,100 | $2,100 |
Other | Postage | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
Capital Equipment | Laptop Computers (2) w/software | $7,000 | $0 | $0 |
Capital Equipment | 4x4 ATV w/trailer | $7,000 | $0 | $0 |
Other | BMP Contract - Direct Seeding Cost-share | $90,000 | $90,000 | $90,000 |
Other | BMP Contract - erosion/sediment control structures | $15,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 |
Other | BMP - Riparian Plantings - ag fields | $40,920 | $40,920 | $40,920 |
Other | BMP Contract - Livestock Exclusion Fencing | $26,400 | $26,400 | $26,400 |
Other | BMP Contract - Off-site Water Developments | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 |
Other | BMP - range/pasture riparian plantings | $40,920 | $40,920 | $40,920 |
Other | Contract - USGS monitoring station | $15,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 |
Overhead | Indirect Costs | $27,428 | $28,198 | $28,998 |
Totals | $482,106 | $476,576 | $485,376 |
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: | $1,444,058 |
Total work element budget: | $1,444,058 |
Cost sharing
Funding source/org | Item or service provided | FY 07 est value ($) | FY 08 est value ($) | FY 09 est value ($) | Cash or in-kind? | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality | Grant funding to support direct-seed cost-share on 303(d) listed water bodies with sediment listing. | $75,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Confirmed |
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality | Grant funding to support riparian restoration on pasture and range lands on 303(d) listed waters | $20,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Confirmed |
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality | Grant funding to support riparian restoration on pasture and range lands on 303(d) listed waters. | $15,000 | $5,000 | $0 | Cash | Under Review |
Idaho Department of Fish and Game | Funding through the Land Owner Incentive Program for Latah SWCD staffing | $34,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Under Review |
Idaho Soil Conservation Commission | Grant funding to support riparian restoration on pasture and range lands on 303(d) listed waters. | $25,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Confirmed |
Idaho Soil Conservation Commission | Grant funding to support direct-seed cost-share on 303(d) listed water bodies with sediment listing. | $75,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Confirmed |
Idaho State Department of Agriculture | Engineering assistance with livestock BMP design and inspection | $6,000 | $6,000 | $6,000 | In-Kind | Under Review |
Individual landowners/operators | Landowner and operators contribute 25% of BMP implementation cost through cash and labor | $80,000 | $80,000 | $80,000 | In-Kind | Confirmed |
USDA Farm Service Agency | CCRP funded riparian restoration projects | $25,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Under Development |
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service | EQIP funded direct-seeding cost-share and riparian restoration | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Under Development |
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service | Contribution agreement to develop conservation plans for the Continuous Conservation Reserve Program | $30,000 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Under Development |
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service | Planning and engineering techncial assistance with agricultural BMPs | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | In-Kind | Confirmed |
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service | USDA provides the Latah SWCD project staff with office space, utilities and office equipment. | $6,000 | $6,000 | $6,000 | In-Kind | Confirmed |
Totals | $496,000 | $102,000 | $97,000 |
Section 9. Project future
FY 2010 estimated budget: $490,000 FY 2011 estimated budget: $490,000 |
Comments: The implementation practices outlined in FY07-09 would be continued within the same priority watersheds, if needed, or implementation would begin in other watersheds where restoration efforts are needed. Focus would remain with private lands. |
Future O&M costs: The operation and maintenance of installed BMPs will remain the responsibility of landowners per signed contracts. No additional O/M costs will be needed for individual BMPs. Stream monitoring will need to be continued. An annual operations budget of approximately $35,000/year would keep the USGS station and all the tributary temperature and stream gauges operational.
Termination date: 9/30/16
Comments: The 377,000 Potlatch River watershed is a large area predominantly under private ownership. An integrated implementation effort by affected state and federal agencies could make measureable differences to A-run steelhead habitat within the watershed. However, habitat restoration work on this scale will respond slowly and major land-use changes not addressed by this project could significantly impact the conditions within the watershed. With the proposed 10-year time horizon, measureable changes could be made to steelhead habitat on private lands within the lower tributaries of the Potlatch system. New efforts may be needed to protect and/or restore areas within the upper watersheds.
Final deliverables: - 10-20 miles of restored riparian habitat within the dryland agricultural regions of the watershed. - 10-20 miles of restored riparian habitat within active pasture and rangelands. - 10,000 - 20,000 acres for agriculture land converted from conventional tillage to continuous direct seeding systems. - Higher, on average, summer flows from tributaries within the lower Potlatch River watershed. - Lower stream tempertures in areas serving as rearing habitat. - Decreased levels of sedimentation in spawning reaches of tributaries and the mainstem. - Measureable increases in riparian habitat complexity. - Wider steelhead distribution within the watershed, as a whole, and higher productivity within treated tributaries. - Baseline flow and temperature measurements for the watershed that can be used as reference background data for future restoration efforts. - A complementary and functional TMDL implementation plan for the Potlatch River with measureable progress to obtaining Idaho's water quality standards and established beneficial uses (including spawning and rearing habitat). - Productive family farms and ranching operations that have implemented restoration BMPs and have remained profitable. - Community members who are informed about A-run steelhead needs for healthy habitats and are willing, and able, to implement restoration projects throughout the watershed.
Section 10. Narrative and other documents
Reviews and recommendations
FY07 budget | FY08 budget | FY09 budget | Total budget | Type | Category | Recommendation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
$397,486 | $397,486 | $397,486 | $1,192,458 | Expense | ProvinceExpense | Fund |
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
$397,486 | $397,486 | $397,486 | $0 | ProvinceExpense |
ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)
Recommendation: Fundable
NPCC comments: The ISRP is pleased to see stronger ties to fish and aquatic habitat here than in most SWCD proposals; this still works to implement Best Management Practices, but the authors have done an assessment and prioritized the tributaries with an understanding of what needs to be worked on first. This is a very strong point of this proposal. They used information from their assessment to actually inform their current understanding; i.e., some of the assessment data changed their minds. There is also a strong working connection, not just lip service, to IDFG steelhead studies on the Potlatch system. The M&E needs to be better developed and coordinated; see ISRP's programmatic comments on M&E. Fish monitoring would be dependent upon IDFG. This is not likely a situation where in-depth habitat effectiveness monitoring is needed. The effectiveness monitoring should use methods that are peer reviewed and up to Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) and Collaborative Systemwide Evaluation Program (CSMEP) standards. In order to track progress toward a "restored" state, abundance targets (in this case, numbers of steelhead) are needed. Project staff will need to work with others to better identify abundance goals for fish in the Potlatch River. On page 9, paragraph 2 of the proposal, 5,900 - 10,000 adult A-run steelhead are identified as the goal for the Clearwater, and sponsors suggest that the Potlatch could produce a significant number of these fish. These goals should largely be identified by management agencies and perhaps a recovery plan.
ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)
Recommendation: Fundable
NPCC comments: The ISRP is pleased to see stronger ties to fish and aquatic habitat here than in most SWCD proposals; this still works to implement Best Management Practices, but the authors have done an assessment and prioritized the tributaries with an understanding of what needs to be worked on first. This is a very strong point of this proposal. They used information from their assessment to actually inform their current understanding; i.e., some of the assessment data changed their minds. There is also a strong working connection, not just lip service, to IDFG steelhead studies on the Potlatch system. The M&E needs to be better developed and coordinated; see ISRP's programmatic comments on M&E. Fish monitoring would be dependent upon IDFG. This is not likely a situation where in-depth habitat effectiveness monitoring is needed. The effectiveness monitoring should use methods that are peer reviewed and up to Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) and Collaborative Systemwide Evaluation Program (CSMEP) standards. In order to track progress toward a "restored" state, abundance targets (in this case, numbers of steelhead) are needed. Project staff will need to work with others to better identify abundance goals for fish in the Potlatch River. On page 9, paragraph 2 of the proposal, 5,900 - 10,000 adult A-run steelhead are identified as the goal for the Clearwater, and sponsors suggest that the Potlatch could produce a significant number of these fish. These goals should largely be identified by management agencies and perhaps a recovery plan.