FY 2003 Columbia Cascade proposal 29008
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
29008 Sponsor Response to ISRP | Response |
29008 Narrative | Narrative |
29008 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Adult Passage Counting and Trapping at Zosel Dam |
Proposal ID | 29008 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (CCT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Jerry Marco |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155 |
Phone / email | 5096342114 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Joe Peone |
Review cycle | Columbia Cascade |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Cascade / Okanogan |
Short description | Conduct feasibility assessment of adult fish counting at Zosel Dam on the Okanogan River and evaluate preferred option. Design, install and evaluate adult trapping facilities at Zosel Dam. |
Target species | Sockeye, Summer/Fall Chinook, Spring Chinook, Steelhead |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
48.929 | -119.421 | Zosel Dam, Okanogan River Mile 78. |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Action 107 |
Action 118 |
Action 193 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
20001300 | Evaluation of experimental re-introduction of Sockeye Salmon into Skaha Lake |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Assess feasibility of conducting adult fish passage counts at Zosel Dam using current technology | a. Assess Adult Counting Feasibility | 1 | $22,982 | Yes |
2. Design Adult Trapping Facilities. | a.Design Trapping Facilities | 1 | $85,492 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
3. Contruct/Fabricate/Install Adult Trapping Facilities. | 2004 | 2004 | $300,000 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004 |
---|
$300,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
4. Evaluate Trapping Facilities at Zosel Dam. | 2004 | 2004 | $15,000 |
5. Evaluate Adult Counting Facilities at Zosel Dam. | 2004 | 2005 | $200,000 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|
$140,000 | $75,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $11,352 | |
Fringe | Benefits @ 24% | $2,724 |
Travel | 3000 miles @ $.345/mile | $1,035 |
Indirect | Indirect Overhead at 42.1% | $6,363 |
PIT tags | # of tags: 0 | $0 |
Subcontractor | Trap Design, Feasibility Assessment | $87,000 |
$108,474 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost | $108,474 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2003 budget request | $108,474 |
FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Outyear costs as identified in this proposal are contingent upon the results of work to be conducted in FY03. These costs have estimated to assist in long term fiscal planning.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable only if response is adequate
Mar 1, 2002
Comment:
A response is needed. The proposal is for a feasibility study to develop an ability to count adult anadromous fish as they pass Zosel Dam on their way to Lake Osoyoos and its tributaries. Lake Osoyoos is one of two lakes in the Columbia Basin that continue to support healthy populations of sockeye salmon. Previous efforts to count fish with video cameras as they transited the ladders were not entirely satisfactory. This proposal is to test newly developed technology for its use in this application. Recommended adjustments in the ladders arising from the previous experience will also be incorporated.There is a particular need for more information on sockeye salmon survival rates and other life history characteristics. Their limited distribution and special life histories have combined to limit the opportunity for studies. The Okanogan run of sockeye exhibits some unusual behavior patterns in response to a temperature block that sometimes occurs at the mouth of the river. Unexplained losses of fish occur between Wells Dam, which is the last upstream counting station, and counts on the spawning grounds.
This project is fundable on a technical basis and is an important project that merits high priority. However, a response is needed on the following two items: 1) cost estimates need to be better justified, and 2) alternatives to blocking the spillbays should be explored.
Comment:
This project would address a major data gap in adult counting. The ladder counts at Wells Dam as compared with the spawning survey counts vary by 100%. This project would fill a gap between those two locations. The first year of the study is a feasibility study to determine all possible options.Comment:
Fundable. The proposal is for a feasibility study to develop an ability to count adult anadromous fish as they pass Zosel Dam on their way to Lake Osoyoos and its tributaries. Lake Osoyoos is one of two lakes in the Columbia Basin that continue to support healthy populations of sockeye salmon. Previous efforts to count fish with video cameras as they transited the ladders were not entirely satisfactory. This proposal is to test newly developed technology for its use in this application. Recommended adjustments in the ladders arising from the previous experience will also be incorporated.There is a particular need for more information on sockeye salmon survival rates and other life history characteristics. Their limited distribution and special life histories have combined to limit the opportunity for studies. The Okanogan run of sockeye exhibits some unusual behavior patterns in response to a temperature block that sometimes occurs at the mouth of the river. Unexplained losses of fish occur between Wells Dam, which is the last upstream counting station, and counts on the spawning grounds.
This project is fundable on a technical basis and is an important project that merits high priority. The response adequately addressed the ISRP's concerns with cost estimates and alternatives to blocking the spillbays.
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUThis stock Assessment project would enumerate sockeye and potentially other species.
Comments
Good project but major species of interest is Okanogan Sockeye; listed species at low level of usage at present. Results may provide information on adult losses above Wells Dam.
Already ESA Req? No
Biop? No
Comment:
Appears to be a responsibility of Douglas County PUD and/or WDOEComment: