FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23005
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23005 Narrative | Narrative |
Budget Erratum | Narrative Attachment |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Develop an Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Carrying Capacity Model |
Proposal ID | 23005 |
Organization | University of Idaho (UI) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Ernie Brannon, Ph.D. |
Mailing address | University of Idaho Aquaculture Research Institute Moscow, ID 83844-2260 |
Phone / email | 2088857860 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Ted Morhorst |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / |
Short description | Develop a model of carrying capacity for juvenile salmonids using a combination of field laboratory and field sites. |
Target species | chinook, coho, steelhead |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
46.474 | -116.7653 | Potlatch Canal |
46.3717 | -116.1697 | Lolo Creek |
46.5114 | -114.7606 | Papoose Creek |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $137,358 | |
Fringe | $31,494 | |
Supplies | $7,500 | |
Travel | $15,000 | |
Indirect | $49,758 | |
Subcontractor | $134,785 | |
$375,895 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $375,895 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $375,895 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Potlatch | electricity/maintanence | $105,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. This proposal offers assessment capabilities.Comment:
This project should be considered for subbasin assessments and subbasin planning. The model would greatly assist subbasin planning for supplementation activities.