FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23044
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23044 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Naches River Water Treatment Plant Intake Screening Project. |
| Proposal ID | 23044 |
| Organization | City of Yakima (Yakima, WA) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Dave Brown |
| Mailing address | 2301 Fruitvale Blvd. Yakima, WA 98902 |
| Phone / email | 5095756204 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Dueane Calvin |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
| Short description | Screen City of Yakima's Naches Water Treatment Plant intake to eliminate mortality of ESA listed and non-listed salmonids at this location. |
| Target species | Steelhead, bull trout, spring chinook, coho, resident non-salmonids |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 46.6297 | -120.545 | Naches River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Subcontractor | $1,657,500 | |
| $1,657,500 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $1,657,500 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $1,657,500 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| City of Yakima | Project Design/Construction | $292,500 | cash |
| City of Yakima | Project Management | $35,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
The proposal is to install screens at the intake to the City of Yakima's Water Treatment Plant on the Naches River. There will likely be some fish benefits. The improved screens will eliminate or reduce mortality of juvenile salmonids, as some are entrained into the water treatment plant. However, there is inadequate specification of benefits to fish. This appears to be screening of the intake facilities. Would it be feasible to screen the canal where water is redirected from the river? This proposal may raise an in lieu issue, which is beyond the ISRP's purview.Comment:
This proposal has not been coordinated with the co-managers. This project raises in-lieu concerns as well as funding activities beyond the screening implementation.