FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23058

Additional documents

TitleType
23058 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleAcquire BAIC Tract: Wildlife Mitigation Site - Horn Butte Area, Oregon
Proposal ID23058
OrganizationThe Nature Conservancy of Oregon/Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (TNC/ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameCatherine Macdonald
Mailing address821 SE 14th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97214-2537
Phone / email5032301221 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectCatherine Macdonald/Susan Barnes
Review cycleFY 2001 High Priority
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Umatilla
Short descriptionProtect portion of largest tract of undeveloped shrubsteppe habitat in the Oregon portion of the Columbia Basin from conversion to agriculture. Secure 22,000 acres of critical habitat for Washington ground squirrel and numerous other wildlife species
Target speciesWashington ground squirrel, burrowing owls, long-billed curlews, loggerhead shrikes, northern sagebrush lizards, grasshopper sparrows, ferruginous hawks, and Swainson's hawks
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.6718 -120.0237 Horn Butte
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$250,000$255,200$260,608$266,232

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$20,000$20,800$21,632$22,497

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: Task 1a,b = .17FTE @ $60,000/yr; Task 2a-c, 3a = .8FTE Manager @ $35,000/yr; .5FTE Tech @ $20,000 $48,200
Fringe (Total Salary x .38%) $18,316
Supplies air photos, monitoring equipment, $5,000
Travel 3000 miles @.32; $500 lodging; $1000 vehicle fuel; $1,200 insurance; $750 maintenance $4,400
Indirect (22%) $16,701
Capital Estimated value of 23,000 acres ($239/acre) $5,502,000; title ins & closing costs Truck $20,000 $5,522,000
Subcontractor Level 1 Hazardous Materials assessment $8,000
Other Appraisal $17,000
Subcontractor Complete a HEP assessment $20,000
Subcontractor Cultural Resources Evaluation $10,000
$5,669,617
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$5,669,617
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$5,669,617
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
The Nature Conservancy Land acquisition negotiation, legal document preparation, etc. $13,800 in-kind
The Nature Conservancy Supplies and materials $5,000 cash
BAIC Inc. Management planning, travel costs, vehicle purchase, ($130,000 year indexed to inflation for long-term management costs) $40,000 cash
Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Expert assistance on HEP analysis, management planning and implementation $0 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
N/A
Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

Does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks. The emphasis is on wildlife. They do not make a strong enough case for benefits to anadromous fish, although they list generic benefits.
Recommendation:
HP "B" R
Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment: