FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23063
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23063 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Bull Trout Population Assessment |
| Proposal ID | 23063 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Mary L. Hanson |
| Mailing address | PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 |
| Phone / email | 5038725252 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Robert. L. Hooton |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / |
| Short description | Characterize bull trout in Oregon |
| Target species | Bull Trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 45.7204 | -121.5067 | Hood River |
| 45.7318 | -120.6499 | John Day River |
| 44.0585 | -116.9731 | Malheur River |
| 45.9144 | -119.3384 | Umatilla River |
| 46.0624 | -118.9393 | Walla Walla River |
| 46.0718 | -116.9845 | Grande Ronde River |
| 45.8167 | -116.7649 | Imnaha River |
| 44.7455 | -117.0508 | Powder River |
| Pine Creek |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 40 months of seasonal time | $84,999 |
| Fringe | OPE @ 39.5% | $55,496 |
| Supplies | Equipment (dry suit, waders) and field supplies | $1,500 |
| Travel | Vehicle rent, mileage, and per diem | $21,850 |
| Indirect | @ 20.1% | $27,894 |
| $191,739 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $191,739 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $191,739 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| ODFW | Staff support, training | $13,200 | in-kind |
| USFS | Field support | $5,040 | in-kind |
| Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation | Field support | $720 | in-kind |
| Burns Paiute Tribe | Field support | $720 | in-kind |
| ODFW volunteers | Field support | $4,290 | in-kind |
| Bureau of Reclamation | Field support | $550 | in-kind |
| Bureau of Land Management | Field support | $550 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for an assessment does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment: