FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23065
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23065 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Develop System to Aquire Additional In-stream Flow Through Market Based Incentives |
Proposal ID | 23065 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Rick Kepler |
Mailing address | PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 |
Phone / email | 5038725255 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Rick Kepler |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Cooperatively work with the Oregon Water Resources Dept. Oregon Water Trust and water right holders to develop a system for identifying willing participants who will increase instream flows through purchasing, leasing, water banking or conserving water. |
Target species | Will benefit all listed and resident salmonid species depending on which are present in the stream where in-stream water is aquired. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|---|---|
$500,000 | $1,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $4,000,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 1 | $35,091 |
Supplies | $4,397 | |
Travel | $10,000 | |
Indirect | 20.1% | $10,954 |
Capital | To initiate program for purchase, lease or conserved water. Will need long term funding source. | $250,000 |
$310,442 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $310,442 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $310,442 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for an assessment does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
The project will be more fully developed and submitted in the Columbia Plateau Province Review focusing in the John Day River.