FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23096
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23096 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Assessment of Riparian Condition Through Spectrometric Imaging of Riparian Vegetation |
| Proposal ID | 23096 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (OR DEQ) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Matt Boyd |
| Mailing address | 811 SW 6th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204-1334 |
| Phone / email | 5032295374 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Dick Pedersen 503-229-6345 |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / |
| Short description | Remote multispectral imaging will be used to document riparian vegetation for all Columbia Basin lands within Oregon. DEQ will use the data to establish TMDLs to improve water quality for fish and aquatic life, including ESA-listed species. |
| Target species | All aquatic species, with particular emphasis on salmonids and other cold water fish |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $87,192 | |
| Supplies | Multispectral imagery Software Ground-level data | $152,808 |
| $240,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $240,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $240,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This assessment proposal does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
Project relates to TMDL schedule and process.