FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22032
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
22032 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Develop a practical method through diet modification to improve quality of hatchery reared steelhead trout and coho salmon. |
Proposal ID | 22032 |
Organization | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Frederic T. Barrows |
Mailing address | 4050 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman, Montana |
Phone / email | 4065879265 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Frederic T. Barrows |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Innovative |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Prevent fin erosion in steelhead and sunburn (steatitis) in coho salmon by providing cost-effective, nutritionally complete, feeds. Current feeds are deficient in essential trace elements. |
Target species | steelhead trout and coho salmon |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 3 full time GS-5, 1 year | $70,989 |
Fringe | $14,198 | |
Supplies | Feed ingredients, analytical supplies/services, etc. | $69,903 |
Travel | PI visits to study locations, lab and production | $9,340 |
Indirect | @27% | $65,070 |
Capital | experimental tanks and feeders for installation at a production Coho hatchery | $11,500 |
PIT tags | $0 | |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
$241,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $241,000 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $241,000 |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
USFWS, Bozeman FTC | PI time, support staff, water costs | $27,481 | in-kind |
University of Idaho | PI time, support staff | $23,000 | in-kind |
USFWS, Abernathy FTC | PI time | $19,741 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
While the panel recognizes that fin erosion and sunburn are fish production problems, this proposal was not viewed as being sufficiently innovative because diet modification is standard hatchery practice. The Panel would have been more supportive if the proposal had established priority need for the work relative to Fish and Wildlife Program priorities. Idaho State University was incorrectly identified as a project co-sponsor.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.