FY 2002 LSRCP proposal 200113

Additional documents

TitleType
200113 and 200117 Powerpoint Presentation Powerpoint Presentation
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Overview Powerpoint Presentation Powerpoint Presentation

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleLyons Ferry Complex (Lyons Ferry and Tucannon Hatchery) Operations and Maintenance
Proposal ID200113
OrganizationWashington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameHarold R. Harty
Mailing addressP.O. Box 278 Starbuck, WA 99359-0278
Phone / email5096469201 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectDan Herrig, Coordinator; LSRCP
Review cycleLSRCP
Province / SubbasinBlue Mountain / Grande Ronde
Short descriptionRestore steelhead fisheries and populations through release of yearling smolts produced at Lyons Ferry Hatchery
Target speciesOncorynchus mykiss, summer steelhead
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
46.5894 -118.2196 Lyons Ferry
46.3153 -117.6616 Tucannon Hatchery
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA
Hatchery RPA Action 169
Hatchery RPA Action 170
Hatchery RPA Action 173
Hatchery RPA Action 174
Hatchery RPA Action 176

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1995 Propagate 256K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead
1996 Propagate 265K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead
1997 Propagate 275K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead
1998 Propagate 252K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead
1999 Propagate 268K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead
2000 Propagate 274K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead
2001 Propagate 215K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan (LSRCP) Mitigation for damages caused to populations of fish and wildlife within the Lower Snake River as a result of construction of the four lower Snake dams (part of the FCRPS)
US v Oregon CRFMP Production will meet agreements negotiated in the CRFMP
8805301 Northeast Oregon Hatchery Master Plan Nez Perce Tribe identified Cottonwood Acclimation Pond as site for fall chinook acclimation
Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program Provide habitat improvements which may increase in-river survival and aid in recovery of stocks.
LSRCP Monitoring and Evaluation - WDFW/Snake River Lab Documents adult run size, identifies the incidence of straying, evaluates juvenile rearing, marking, size and time of release. Documents endemic steelhead adult run size.
ESA Listing - Snake River Steelhead NMFS directive to develop local native steelhead broodstocks, reduced production of Wallowa stock steelhead
LSRCP Monitoring and Evaluation - Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Identifies steelhead stocks through genetic anaylsis and cooperative evaluation with WDFW to determine logistics for use of local steelhead for hatchery broodstock

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
(Not Applicable) $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
(Not Applicable) $0
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
(Not Applicable) $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
(Not Applicable) $0
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Coordinate Lyons Ferry Complex operations with co-managers a. Develop Annual Operations Plan (AOP) directing Lyons Ferry Complex operations and co-managers activities. continuous $500
b. Participate in periodic Lyons Ferry Complex operations reveiws and quarterly coordination meeting with co-manager to coordinate activities. continuous $0
2. Produce 200K smolt Wallowa stock summer steelhead. a. Collect broodstock at Cottonwood Creek trap and transfer adults to adult holding section of trap. continuous $128,377
b. Spawn adults at trap site and transport gametes to Lyons Ferry Hatchery for combining and egg incubation. continuous $0
c. Trough and pond fry and juveniles per production profile continuous $0
d. Adipose fin clip and transfer finerling to large (675,000 cu.ft.) rearing lake #3. continuous $0
e. Perform fish health (i.e., inspection, treatment, etc.), propagation (i.e., feeding, pond cleaning, etc.) and facility maintenance on a scheduled and as needed basis. continuous $0
f. Transfer juveniles to north side raceways and mark (LV fin clip, CWT, Brand) continuous $0
g. Transport to Cottonwood Acclimation Pond in February for final rearing and release continuous $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Coordinate Lyons Ferry Complex operations with co-managers 2003 2006 $2,333
2. Produce 200K Wallowa stock summer steelhead 2003 2006 $580,917
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$135,321$142,087$149,191$156,651

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
(Not Applicable) $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
(Not Applicable) $0
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: 0.84 $33,378
Fringe @ 26.2%% $8,746
Supplies $37,472
Travel $716
Indirect @ 25.2% $22,752
Capital $8,095
Other Marking $17,718
$128,877
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$128,877
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$128,877
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable only if response is adequate
Date:
Dec 21, 2001

Comment:

See ISRP review of other Grande Ronde LSRCP projects [200117, 200120] and comments in Columbia Plateau section above [comments contained in project numbers 200121, 200122, 200123, 200124, 200125, 200126] for the Lyons Ferry projects.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Apr 23, 2002

Comment:

Fundable. The respondents presented a helpful package of information and responses to ISRP questions. Their responses amply address the ISRP's preliminary review requests for description of the scientific basis for the program; reference to relevant literature on steelhead residualization and reproductive performance; clarification of technical matters such as sample site selection and assessment of data quality; description of broodstock development; and clarification of harvest goals. If future preparations for review build on this, the processing of the resultant materials should be efficient. WDFW should be congratulated on their efforts to reduce straying, production, and to protect endemic gene pools.

Although they have taken considerable action to prevent their program from causing further jeopardy for wild stocks, and will continue to do so, they inform the ISRP that they will not stop mitigation actions authorized under the LSRCP. They blame NMFS in one instance, for not providing guidance on the amount of reduction needed to preclude deleterious effects in wild fish, but WDFW should take responsibility in determining what steps to take to avoid potential harm caused by the fish they release. The intent of this program is to use LSRCP authorization to produce fish for harvest, but a primary intent of other basin programs is to conserve native species and increase abundance to useful and persistent levels. These differing views of "basin management" may have several incompatibilities.

If hatchery production (Project 200114) was reduced by 7,000 lb annually to redirect some money into habitat structure construction (p 4), does that habitat structure work continue today?