FY 2002 Mountain Snake proposal 198909802
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198909802 Narrative | Narrative |
198909802 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
ISS Cooperator Responses to ISRP Comments Idaho Supplementation Studies | Response |
198909802 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Mountain Snake: Salmon Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Mountain Snake: Salmon Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Evaluate Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers- Nez Perce Tribe |
Proposal ID | 198909802 |
Organization | Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Jay A. Hesse |
Mailing address | PO Box 365 Lapwai, Idaho 83540 |
Phone / email | 2088437145 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Jaime A. Pinkham |
Review cycle | Mountain Snake |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
Short description | Evaluates hatchery supplementation as a recovery - restoration tool for spring and summer chinook salmon. Quantifies key population status and performance varibles, including early-life history and smolt- toadult survival rates. |
Target species | Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
45.2564 | -115.8962 | Lake Creek in the Secesh River drainage (Salmon River subbasin) |
45.14 | -115.79 | Secesh River (Salmon River subbasin) |
45.6397 | -116.2843 | Slate Creek (Salmon River subbasin |
47.0581 | -115.5322 | Papoose Creek (Clearwater River subbasin) |
46.6306 | -115.4655 | Squaw Creek (Clearwater River subbasin) |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Hydro RPA Action 107 |
Hydro RPA Action 118 |
Hatchery RPA Action 169 |
Hatchery RPA Action 174 |
RM&E RPA Action 185 |
RM&E RPA Action 189 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|---|---|---|
NMFS | Action 182 | NMFS | The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional priorities and congressional appropriations processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for studies to determine the reproductive success of hatchery fish relative to wild fish. At a minimum, two to four studies shall be conducted in each ESU. The Action Agencies shall work with the Technical Recovery Teams to identify the most appropriate populations or stocks for these studies no later than 2002. Studies will begin no later than 2003. |
NMFS | Action 184 | NMFS | The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for a hatchery research, monitoring, and evaluation program consisting of studies to determine whether hatchery reforms reduce the risk of extinction for Columbia River basin salmonids and whether conservation hatcheries contribute to recovery. |
NMFS/BPA | Action 182 | NMFS | The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional priorities and congressional appropriations processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for studies to determine the reproductive success of hatchery fish relative to wild fish. At a minimum, two to four studies shall be conducted in each ESU. The Action Agencies shall work with the Technical Recovery Teams to identify the most appropriate populations or stocks for these studies no later than 2002. Studies will begin no later than 2003. |
NMFS/BPA | Action 184 | NMFS | The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for a hatchery research, monitoring, and evaluation program consisting of studies to determine whether hatchery reforms reduce the risk of extinction for Columbia River basin salmonids and whether conservation hatcheries contribute to recovery. |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1991 | Identified study areas, brood stocks, facilities to be used. |
1992 | Released supplementation fish into treatment streams, conducted spawning ground surveys, juvenile emigrant surveys and snorkeling surveys. Juvenile hatchery and naturally produced fish were tagged for survival analysis. |
1993 | An annual report was written. Continued to release parr and smolts into treatment streams. Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data. |
1994 | An annual report was written. Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data. |
1995 | Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data |
1996 | Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data |
1997 | First generation returns, a known broodstock for supplementation is established. Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data. |
1998 | Released hatchery parr and smolts into treatment streams. Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data. |
1999 | Released hatchery parr and smolts into treatment streams. Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data. |
2000 | Idaho Supplementation Studies 5 Year Report (1992-1996), Completed. (Walters et al 2001) An annual report was written. Continued to collect spawning ground data, snorkeling data, genetic data, juvenile emigrant data and survival data. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
198833500 | Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation (NPTH M&E) | NPTH M&E collects data in two treatment and one control streams required under the ISS study design. Lolo Creek, Newsome Creek, and Eldorado Creek |
199604300 | Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement (JCAPE M&E) Monitoring and Evaluation | JCAPE M&E collects data ISS required data in Johnson Creek a treatment stream |
19970300 | Listed Salmonid Escapment Monitoring (underwater video) | This project enumerates adult escapment in Lake Creek and Secesh River and provides an measure to compare redd counts and the ability to calculate fish per redd estimates. |
198909800 | Idaho Salmon Supplementation Studies -IDFG | IDFG is the lead cooperating agency on the ISS study. |
198909801 | Evaluate Salmon Supplementation in Idaho Rivers -USFWS | Cooperating agency on the ISS study. |
198909802 | Idaho Salmon Supplementation Studies -SBT | Cooperating agency on the ISS study. |
199005500 | Steelhead Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers | NPT ISS study PIT tags naturally produced Steelhead for the SSS study in Lake Creek and Secesh River. |
199107300 | Idaho Habitat/ Natural Production Monitoring | Projects cooperatively conduct snorkeling surveys and share data. |
199102800 | Monitoring Smolt Migration of Wild Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon | This study PIT tags parr in Lake Creek and Secesh River. Fish are used to estimated parr to Lower Granite Survival. |
199405000 | Salmon River Habitat Enhancement | Cooperatively collects data and shares results |
199705700 | Salmon River Production Program | Cooperatively collects data shares results |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Monitor and evaluate the effects of supplementation on presmolt and smolt numbers and spawning escapements of naturally produced salmon. | a. Cooperate with IDFG to differentially mark all hatchery supplementation fish and general production fish released in or nearby study streams | 2006 | $13,028 | |
b.Assist in PIT tagging a minimum of 1000 hatchery supplementation fish prior to release for estimating smolt survival in Squaw and Papoose creeks. | 2006 | $17,770 | ||
c Assist in the release of all supplementation fish into study areas for a minimum of one or two generations for each life stage based on existing natural production and natural rearing capacity. | 2006 | $12,477 | ||
d. Operate emigration screw traps on the Secesh River system and assist/report screw trap operations in Lolo Creek (project 198335003), Newsome Creek and Johnson Creek (Project 199604300) to determine life history characteristics and estimate pre-smolt | 2006 | $194,523 | ||
e. A portion (up to 11,000 fish in Lake Creek and Secesh River total) of trapped juvenile chinook salmon will be PIT-tagged to estimate survival using SURPH.2 statistical analysis survival model to lower Granite Dam and Lower Monumental Dam. | 2006 | $28,610 | ||
f. PIT tag a minimum of 1,000 naturally produced parr from Papoose Creek and Squaw Creek. Analyze parr tagging data from Lake Creek, the Secesh River, Johnson Creek, and Lolo Creek. | 2006 | $46,876 | ||
g. Conduct data analysis to compare natural production of supplemented populations to unsupplemented populations and baseline data. | 2006 | $13,028 | ||
2. Monitor and evaluate changes in natural productivity and genetic composition of target and adjacent populations following supplementation. | a. Monitor survival and life history characteristic indices from supplemented populations and compare to baseline and control streams. | 2006 | $13,028 | |
b.Monitor straying and adult escapement of hatchery supplementation fish into adjacent, treatment, and control streams by performing redd surveys, obtaining carcasses or using weirs in the Secesh River, Lake, Johnson, Papoose, Squaw, Lolo, Eldorado, Yoo | 2006 | $49,699 | ||
c. Coordinate adult escapement estimates with the Listed Stock Escapement Monitoring project that uses under water video on the Secesh River system to quantify adult escapement. | 2006 | $11,129 | ||
d. Obtain scales and fin rays from chinook carcasses collected from redd surveys and analyze for age and hatchery or wild origin. Collect length and sex data of carcasses collected from redd surveys. | 2006 | $41,584 | ||
e. Collect snouts or coded wire tags from chinook carcasses collected from redd surveys and analyze for hatchery origin. | 2006 | $25,949 | ||
f. Estimate pre-spawning mortality from redd surveys and carcass counts. Sample the spawning success of chinook carcasses collected from redd surveys. | 2006 | $25,949 | ||
g. Estimate fecundity of naturally and hatchery produced adult chinook salmon collected at weirs. | 2006 | $13,028 | ||
h. Collect tissue samples from chinook salmon carcasses collected from redd surveys for genetic analysis. | 2006 | $25,949 | ||
i Assist the IDFG in analysis of adult return data collected in other ISS streams. | 2006 | $27,828 | ||
3. Determine which supplementation strategies (broodstock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. | a. Monitor and evaluate natural production (presmolt, smolt and adult numbers) and productivity (survival, life stage characteristics and straying) of supplemented populations and compare to baseline and controls. | 2006 | $24,720 | |
b. Assist the IDFG in comparing natural production and productivity indices among supplemented populations using parr, fall presmolt and smolt release strategies. | 2006 | $25,939 | ||
4. Coordinate and transfer technology of supplementation research planning and field evaluation program activities and management recommendations for the Nez Perce Tribe. | a. Participate in planning, review meetings and annual work plan meetings dealing with supplementation research activities. | 2006 | $18,470 | |
b. Develop and provide annual operational plans and associated budgets for Tribal evaluation programs. | 2006 | $5,000 | ||
c. Prepare three quarterly reports. Reports shall be submitted 15 days after the end of quarter. The three quarters will be March 31, July 31, and October 31. | 2006 | $24,496 | ||
d. Prepare and provide annual report summarizing project activities and results. | 2006 | $17,396 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1. Monitor and evaluate the effects of supplementation on presmolt and smolt numbers and spawning escapements of naturally produced salmon. | 2003 | 2006 | $1,340,483 |
2. Monitor and evaluate changes in natural productivity and genetic composition of target and adjacent populations following supplementation. | 2003 | 2006 | $961,856 |
3. Determine which supplementation strategies (broodstock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. | 2003 | 2006 | $208,107 |
4. Coordinate and transfer technology of supplementation research planning and field evaluation program activities and management recommendations for the Nez Perce Tribe. | 2003 | 2006 | $268,508 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
$644,750 | $676,988 | $710,837 | $746,379 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 8.3 | $266,449 |
Fringe | 34.74 | $92,583 |
Supplies | $129,885 | |
Travel | $17,409 | |
Indirect | 20.9% | $105,800 |
Capital | $29,000 | |
NEPA | $0 | |
PIT tags | # of tags: 12,000 | $27,000 |
Subcontractor | $8,350 | |
$676,476 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $676,476 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $676,476 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $419,320 |
% change from forecast | 61.3% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
The reason for the buget increase is three fold. (1) recent increased adult escapement levels increase sampling time and personnel needs to adequately process without adding risk to the fish. Spawning ground surveys and juvenile emmigrant trapping require additonal personnel. (2) The scope of the research in Secesh River system was expanded to meet FCRPS Biop RPA's by quantifying tributary specific smolt-to-adult survival estimates. (3) The Tribes fringe benefit rate increase dramitically.
Reason for change in scope
Intensified juvenile chinook salmon PIT tagging in the Secesh River System to obtian smolt-to-adult survial rates as recommended in NMFS (2000) Biop
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable only if response is adequate
Sep 28, 2001
Comment:
Idaho Supplementation StudiesA response is needed for the set of Idaho Supplementation Study Projects.
Background
Supplementation of natural stocks is not a mandated mitigation objective, but has become an important part of the hatchery programs. Idaho has outplanted (i.e. off-site releases) over 5.5 million chinook fry, approximately 8 million smolts, and 8,000 adults into the Salmon River drainage since 1977 (IDFG et. Al. 1990). During the same period, over 17 million fry, 3 million smolts, and 2,000 adults were outplanted into the Clearwater River drainage (Nez Perce Tribe et. Al. 1990). In spite of widespread outplanting activities there has been little scientific evaluation of supplementation on rebuilding or influencing natural salmon populations both in Idaho and basin wide. Furthermore, despite these hatchery mitigation efforts, anadromous fish stocks in Idaho continued to decline.
The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) spearheaded development of the Idaho Supplementation Studies (ISS) to address questions identified in the Supplementation Technical Work Group (STWG) Five Year Workplan (STWG 1988), as well as help define the potential role of supplementation in managing Idaho's anadromous fisheries and as a recovery tool for the basin. The goal of the Idaho Supplementation Studies is to evaluate various supplementation strategies for maintaining and rebuilding spring/summer chinook salmon populations in Idaho and to develop recommendations for using supplementation to rebuild naturally spawning populations.
Projects directly involved in the ISS are:
- Project ID: 198909800. Idaho Supplementation Studies. Sponsor: Idaho Department of Fish and Game and Idaho Office of Species Conservation. Subbasin: Salmon.
- Project ID: 198909801. Evaluate Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers (ISS). Sponsor: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Idaho Fishery Resource Office. Subbasin: Clearwater.
- Project ID: 198909802. Evaluate Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers- Nez Perce Tribe. Sponsor: Nez Perce Tribe. Subbasin: Salmon.
- Project ID: 198909803. Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes. Sponsor: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes. Subbasin: Salmon
- Project ID: 199005500. Steelhead Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers. Sponsor: Idaho Department of Fish and Game and Idaho Office of Species Conservation. Subbasin: Clearwater
- Project ID: 199604300. Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement Project. Sponsor: Nez Perce Tribe. Subbasin: Salmon.
ISS also coordinates field activities and data collection efforts with the Idaho Habitat/ Natural Production Monitoring project (199107300). ISS also coordinates with and transfers data to projects in the Salmon River subbasin including the Monitoring Smolt Migration of Wild Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon (199102800), Salmon River Habitat Enhancement (9405000), and Salmon River Production Program (199705700). ISS also works closely with the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan (LSRCP) to coordinate on hatchery supplementation treatments and evaluations.
Presently, there are eleven state and federal anadromous hatcheries operating in Idaho: Clearwater, Oxbow, Rapid River, McCall, Sawtooth, Pahsimeroi, Dworshak, Kooskia, Hagerman National, Niagara Springs, and Magic Valley. There are also three satellite rearing ponds: Powell, Red River, and Crooked River operated in conjunction with the Clearwater Hatchery. These hatcheries have the combined capacity to produce 8.5 million spring chinook smolts, 2 million summer chinook smolts, 6.7 million A-run steelhead O. mykiss smolts, and 4 million B-run steelhead smolts annually.
ISS Study Design
The ISS study design called for a minimum of 15 years (three generations) of research (Bowles and Leitzinger 1991). Sampling was initiated in 1991, and implementation began in 1992. Supplementation effects are monitored and evaluated by comparing juvenile production and survival, fecundity, age structure, and genetic structure and variability in treatment and control streams of similar ecological parameters.
Due to the large geographic scope of this study, study streams were partitioned among four resource management entities for implementation. These include Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Nez Perce Tribe, Shoshone-Bannock Tribe, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Idaho Fishery Resource Office. Allocations were based on interest, integration with ongoing programs, cost efficiency, logistics and, to a lesser extent, relative equity. Approximately one-half of the study will be implemented by Idaho Department of Fish and Game through the ISS contract with BPA. The Nez Perce Tribe and Shoshone-Bannock Tribe have similar commitments to ISS, each comprising approximately 20% of the study. Both of these components rely heavily on integration of existing or proposed tribal programs. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Idaho Fishery Resource Office implements about ten percent of the project. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game is the lead agency regarding project development, coordination, and implementation.
The ISS Experimental Design was completed and published in 1991. Baseline data collection and development of supplementation brood stocks (Phase I) began in 1991. Over a period of about five years, supplementation brood stocks were developed for seven hatchery trap/release locations as identified in the experimental design:
Artificial Production Facilities
- Sawtooth Fish Hatchery - Upper Salmon River
- Pahsimeroi Fish Hatchery - Pahsimeroi River
- McCall Fish Hatchery - South Fork Salmon River Clearwater Fish Hatchery Satellites
- Crooked River
- Red River
- Powell (Colt-killed Creek)
- Clear Creek - Kooskia National Fish Hatchery
As adult fish began to return from the Phase I supplementation brood stock juvenile releases, the project progressed into Phase II. Phase II utilizes the returning adults to supplement natural origin recruits in treatment streams and maintains supplementation brood stocks for juvenile production and release. Juvenile fish releases through brood year 1996 include 1,281,755 fish in the Clearwater River basin and 1,954,048 fish in the Salmon River basin.
This project is now transitioning from Phase II to Phase III, monitoring the effects of supplementation. In Phase III juvenile releases from supplementation brood stocks are eventually terminated, returning adults from prior juvenile releases are released to supplement spawning of natural origin recruits, and monitoring of production and productivity response variables in control and treatment streams continues. In 2000, juvenile releases were maintained at levels similar to releases in 1999.
Treatment (e.g. supplementation in general, supplementation with a particular life stage, supplementation with a particular brood source) effects will be tested directly by hypotheses. In general, treatments will be applied for one to two generations (5-10 years) following approximately one generation of pretreatment data. Population responses to supplementation will be monitored a minimum of one generation (5 years) following supplementation. It is important that the original study design be maintained. Reducing sample size (number of treatment streams) can potentially impair the sensitivity of the design. Reducing to five treatment streams provides only a 60% chance of detecting a 25% change in production, whereas we would still have over 95% chance of detecting a 50% change.
Related projects
Several additional projects are related to the ISS. The monitoring and evaluation portion of the Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement project (199604300) conducts the juvenile emigration and survival, adult escapement (weir and spawning ground surveys), and genetic monitoring associated with the ISS project in Johnson Creek. The Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation project (198335003) collects the data associated with the ISS project in Lolo Creek, Eldorado Creek, and Newsome Creeks in the Clearwater River subbasin. The Nez Perce Tribe Monitoring of Listed Stock Chinook Salmon Escapement project (BPA Number 199703000) operates a video camera and weir to passively monitor and enumerate adults returning to Lake Creek and upper Secesh River. This project collects data on adult abundance and migration timing of chinook salmon.
ISRP Preliminary Recommendations:
As initially planned, the Idaho Supplementation Study (ISS) was probably the best supplementation study among the Provinces. It should be continued, but the ISRP has a number of concerns that should be addressed while there is still time. This study addresses the critical issue of the efficacy of supplementation to restore populations and many resources have been committed to it. With the experimental design of the Yakima Hatchery in question (no wild/wild and no hatchery/hatchery controls), retaining the integrity of this experiment is crucial. It is important that the Idaho Supplementation Studies be completed following the original approved experimental design.
The most critical ISRP concerns are:
- the effect of the loss of Johnson Creek (previously a control stream) from the experimental design, and
- the effect of straying of hatchery fish into Lake Creek, the Secesh River, and other designated "controls".
As currently planned in project #199604300 "Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement Project", Johnson Creek is neither a treatment nor a control stream in the ISS because the criteria for stopping supplementation has been changed and does not appear to match the timetable in the ISS. Supplementation activities in Johnson Creek should cease immediately for the duration of the ISS study design, allowing Johnson Creek to continue to be used as a 'control' stream, even given the recent limited supplementation of it. (Note: a portion of the 2001 returning jacks are the first returning fish from the limited Johnson Creek supplementation effort.)
To do minimal damage to the ISS study design, the ISRP recommends that Johnson Creek now be considered a control stream (at least by year class!) and that supplementation be stopped in Johnson Creek in accordance with the original timetable in the ISS. The number of wild returning adults we observed earlier this month spawning in Johnson Creek, and the number we are likely to observe next year, argue that supplementation of Johnson Creek is not needed as an emergency action for a declining stock at least through the duration of the ISS experiment.
As we understand the situation, the decision to remove Johnson Creek from the study was beyond the control of some proponents of the ISS project. Nevertheless, we find it unacceptable that the experimental design for study of such a critical issue as supplementation would be compromised by a decision to remove a control stream from the study. The only conclusion we can come to is that the proponents of the decision to remove Johnson Creek from the supplementation study believe that they already know the result, i.e., they believe supplementation works. A broad base of the scientific community is in extreme disagreement with this conclusion, and it is unacceptable that the best-designed study of supplementation would be compromised.
Other ISRP concerns: The proponents should list the initial control and treatment streams and the current treatments and controls. How has the overall design changed? What is the current timetable to stop supplementation in the treatment streams and to evaluate the effect on natural production? In the control streams, what effect do the straying rates have on the analysis? What would be the effect of changing Johnson Creek from a "control" to a "treatment" stream on the statistical power of the study?
The results of this project should help determine whether supplementation is a viable restoration strategy and as such should inform the RPA four-step safety net process.
There may be a need for ongoing input from an over-site committee with members outside those participating in the study to monitor the progress. Has this been planned for or considered?
Comment:
This project addresses RPAs 174, 182 and 184.Comment:
Idaho Supplementation StudiesBackground
Supplementation of natural stocks is not a mandated mitigation objective, but has become an important part of the hatchery programs. Idaho has outplanted (i.e. off-site releases) over 5.5 million chinook fry, approximately 8 million smolts, and 8,000 adults into the Salmon River drainage since 1977 (IDFG et. al. 1990). During the same period, over 17 million fry, 3 million smolts, and 2,000 adults were outplanted into the Clearwater River drainage (Nez Perce Tribe et. al. 1990). In spite of widespread outplanting activities there has been little scientific evaluation of the efficacy of supplementation on rebuilding or influencing natural salmon populations both in Idaho and basin wide. Furthermore, despite these hatchery mitigation efforts, anadromous fish stocks in Idaho continued to decline.
The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) spearheaded development of the Idaho Supplementation Studies (ISS) to address questions identified in the Supplementation Technical Work Group (STWG) Five Year Workplan (STWG 1988), as well as help define the potential role of supplementation in managing Idaho's anadromous fisheries and as a recovery tool for the basin. The goal of the Idaho Supplementation Studies is to evaluate various supplementation strategies for maintaining and rebuilding spring/summer chinook salmon and steelhead populations in Idaho and to develop recommendations for using supplementation to rebuild naturally spawning populations.
Projects directly involved in the ISS are:
- Project ID 198909800. Idaho Supplementation Studies. Sponsor: Idaho Department of Fish and Game and Idaho Office of Species Conservation. Subbasin: Salmon.
- Project ID 198909801. Evaluate Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers (ISS). Sponsor: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Idaho Fishery Resource Office. Subbasin: Clearwater.
- Project ID 198909802. Evaluate Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers- Nez Perce Tribe. Sponsor: Nez Perce Tribe. Subbasin: Salmon.
- Project ID 198909803. Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes. Sponsor: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes. Subbasin: Salmon
- Project ID 199005500. Steelhead Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers. Sponsor: Idaho Department of Fish and Game and Idaho Office of Species Conservation. Subbasin: Clearwater
- Project ID 199604300. Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement Project. Sponsor: Nez Perce Tribe Subbasin: Salmon.
ISS coordinates field activities and data collection efforts with the Idaho Habitat/ Natural Production Monitoring project (199107300). ISS also coordinates with and transfers data to projects in the Salmon River subbasin including the Monitoring Smolt Migration of Wild Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon (199102800), Salmon River Habitat Enhancement (9405000), and Salmon River Production Program (199705700). ISS also works closely with the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan (LSRCP) to coordinate on hatchery supplementation treatments and evaluations.
Presently, there are eleven state and federal anadromous hatcheries operating in Idaho: Clearwater, Oxbow, Rapid River, McCall, Sawtooth, Pahsimeroi, Dworshak, Kooskia, Hagerman National, Niagara Springs, and Magic Valley. There are also three satellite rearing ponds: Powell, Red River, and Crooked River operated in conjunction with the Clearwater Hatchery. These hatcheries have the combined capacity to produce 8.5 million spring chinook smolts, 2 million summer chinook smolts, 6.7 million A-run steelhead O. mykiss smolts, and 4 million B-run steelhead smolts annually.
ISS Study Design
The ISS study design called for a minimum of 15 years (three generations) of research (Bowles and Leitzinger 1991). Sampling was initiated in 1991, and implementation began in 1992. Supplementation effects are monitored and evaluated by comparing juvenile production and survival, fecundity, age structure, and genetic structure and variability in treatment and control streams of similar ecological parameters.
Due to the large geographic scope of this study, study streams were partitioned among four resource management entities for implementation. These include Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Nez Perce Tribe, Shoshone-Bannock Tribe, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Idaho Fishery Resource Office. Allocations were based on interest, integration with ongoing programs, cost efficiency, logistics, and, to a lesser extent, relative equity. Approximately one-half of the study will be implemented by Idaho Department of Fish and Game through the ISS contract with BPA. The Nez Perce Tribe and Shoshone-Bannock Tribe have similar commitments to ISS, each comprising approximately 20% of the study. Both of these components rely heavily on integration of existing or proposed tribal programs. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Idaho Fishery Resource Office implements about ten percent of the project. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game is the lead agency regarding project development, coordination, and implementation.
The ISS Experimental Design was completed and published in 1991. Baseline data collection and development of supplementation brood stocks (Phase I) began in 1991. Over a period of about five years, supplementation brood stocks were developed for seven hatchery trap/release locations as identified in the experimental design:
Artificial Production Facilities
- Sawtooth Fish Hatchery - Upper Salmon River
- Pahsimeroi Fish Hatchery - Pahsimeroi River
- McCall Fish Hatchery - South Fork Salmon River
- Crooked River
- Red River
- Powell (Colt-killed Creek)
- Clear Creek - Kooskia National Fish Hatchery
Clearwater Fish Hatchery Satellites
As adult fish began to return from the Phase I supplementation brood stock juvenile releases, the project progressed into Phase II. Phase II utilizes the returning adults to supplement natural origin recruits in treatment streams and maintains supplementation broodstocks for juvenile production and release. Juvenile fish releases through brood year 1996 include 1,281,755 fish in the Clearwater River basin and 1,954,048 fish in the Salmon River basin.
This project is now transitioning from Phase II to Phase III, monitoring the effects of supplementation. In Phase III juvenile releases from supplementation brood stocks are to be eventually terminated, returning adults from prior juvenile releases are released to supplement spawning of natural origin recruits, and monitoring of production and productivity response variables in control and treatment streams continues. In 2000, juvenile releases were maintained at levels similar to releases in 1999.
Treatment (e.g. supplementation in general, supplementation with a particular life stage, supplementation with a particular brood source) effects will be tested directly by hypotheses. In general, treatments will be applied for one to two generations (5-10 years) following approximately one generation of pretreatment data. Population responses to supplementation will be monitored a minimum of one generation (5 years) following supplementation. It is important that the original study design be maintained. Reducing sample size (number of treatment streams) can potentially impair the sensitivity of the design. Reducing to five treatment streams provides only a 60% chance of detecting a 25% change in production, whereas we would still have over 95% chance of detecting a 50% change.
Related projects
Several additional projects are related to the ISS. The monitoring and evaluation portion of the Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement project (199604300) conducts the juvenile emigration and survival, adult escapement (weir and spawning ground surveys), and genetic monitoring associated with the ISS project in Johnson Creek. The Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation project (198335003) collects the data associated with the ISS project in Lolo Creek, Eldorado Creek, and Newsome Creeks in the Clearwater River subbasin. The Nez Perce Tribe Monitoring of Listed Stock Chinook Salmon Escapement project (BPA Number 199703000) operates a video camera and weir to passively monitor and enumerate adults returning to Lake Creek and upper Secesh River. This project collects data on adult abundance and migration timing of chinook salmon.
ISRP Final Recommendation:
Not fundable until the ISRP concerns are adequately addressed. The experimental design has not been adhered to over the years and from the response to our preliminary review, the ISRP is not confident it will be in the future. In fact, the current experimental design is not adequately defined. There does not appear to be commitment to treatment durations, particularly to the Phase III portion of the study design, where supplementation ceases, so that treatment effects can be analyzed.
From communications that occurred during the ISRP site visit, it appears the project sponsors should be able to specify timelines for termination of the treatments for each treatment stream. A table needs to be developed for Phase III implementation that describes when the treatments will stop on a stream-by-stream basis. In the past, sponsors have not stuck with agreed upon control streams. How confounded are the treatment and control streams? This points to the need for submittal of a certified statistical design.
Projects 198909800 through 198909803 and 199005500 are fundable after adequately addressing the following constraints.
- A written protocol for complete statistical analysis, certified by an independent statistician team should be presented to Council during the contracting period. The ISRP is not comfortable with the implications that "problems" with the study design can be "fixed" during the statistical analysis stage. Considerable thought and effort should be placed in planning the statistical analyses of these potentially controversial data before final decisions are made on criteria for stopping supplementation and before data are available.
- The protocol for statistical analysis must indicate how straying of hatchery fish into "control streams" and "partial treatments" will be analyzed. For example, the response to the ISRP preliminary review indicated that the straying rate of hatchery fish into the Secesh River from 1996-2001 varied from 0.83% to 14.71%. This is in fact, de facto supplementation. It is unclear to the ISRP how partial treatment and de facto supplementation of control streams will be addressed in the statistical analysis of the ISS.
- Development of a specific stream-by-stream protocol and timetable for implementation of Phase III of the ISS. Included in this is the immediate cessation of supplementation activities in Johnson Creek (see comments below on proposal 199604300) and inclusion of Johnson Creek once again as a control stream in the ISS experimental design.
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUBenefits are indirect. Evaluates hatchery supplementation as a recovery - restoration tool for spring/summer chinook salmon. Quantifies key population status and performance variables, including early-life history and smolt-to-adult survival rates.
Comments
Supplementation of natural stocks has become an important part of the hatchery programs. However, in spite of widespread outplanting activities there has been little scientific evaluation of supplementation on rebuilding or influencing natural salmon populations. The results of these projects should help determine whether supplementation is a viable restoration strategy, a subject which NMFS is currently researching.
Already ESA Req? No
Biop? Yes
Comment:
Recommend funding of ongoing scope of work only after ISRP concerns are addressed and conditioned upon timely submission of reports for implementation of RPAs 182 and 184. We note that this project has consistently struggled with timely submission of annual progress reports. This project now proposes additional objectives that may have merit and could be considered after the ISRP's concerns are addressed and a regional RM&E plan is developed. BPA RPA RPM:
182, 184
NMFS RPA/USFWS RPM:
182, 184
Comment:
Council recommendation: The Council recommends funding for these projects [198909800, 198909801, 198909802, 199604300, 198909803] after the ISRP concerns detailed in programmatic issue 10 are addressed. The sponsors are requested to document their responses, and provide them to the Council for ISRP review. If the ISRP concerns are addressed, only previously approved and ongoing objectives should be funded. NMFS comments provide that these projects address RPAs 182 and 184. Bonneville's "A conditional" rating and comments are consistent with the Council recommendation. All of these proposals are held to funding levels approved by the Council in Fiscal Year 2001 plus 3.4%. The Council also notes that the sponsors need to consider how Johnson Creek will continue to be used in the ISS study as part of its response (this relates to the ISRP's third question on page 45 of its final report and Salmon Issue 8 below) [see Council comments on project 199604300].Comment:
Fund ongoing scope of work only after ISRP concerns are addressed and conditioned upon timely submission of reports for implementation of RPA's 182 and 184.Comment:
[See full document for review of all Idaho Supplementation Studies (ISS) Projects]Comment:
04 slight increase due to salary and COLA increases. Also, some equipment purchases delayed from 03. Still need additional field equipment but did not include in 04 to maintain costs.Comment:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$429,841 | $429,841 | $429,841 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website