FY 2002 Mountain Snake proposal 199204000
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199204000 Narrative | Narrative |
199204000 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Mountain Snake: Salmon Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Mountain Snake: Salmon Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Redfish Lake Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Rearing and Research |
Proposal ID | 199204000 |
Organization | National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Desmond J. Maynard |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 130 Manchester, WA 98353 |
Phone / email | 3608718313 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Thomas A. Flagg |
Review cycle | Mountain Snake |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
Short description | Provide a safety net captive broodstock program for Redfish Lake sockeye salmon. Provide prespawning adults, eyed eggs, and smolts to aid recovery of this ESA-listed endangered species in Idaho |
Target species | Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)-Snake River sockeye salmon ESU |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
47.4361 | -122.6282 | NMFS Burley Creek Hatchery, 11421 Bethel Burley Road, Port Orchard, WA |
47.5727 | -122.6282 | NMFS Manchester Research Station, 27203 Beach Drive, Port Orchard, Wa 98366 |
44.1221 | -114.9278 | Redfish Lake |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Action 177 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|---|---|---|
NMFS | Action 176 | NMFS | BPA shall, in coordination with NMFS, USFWS, and the relevant state and Tribal comanagers, fund the development of HGMPs for the Grande Ronde and Tucannon spring/summer chinook safety-net programs. |
NMFS | Action 177 | NMFS | In 2002, BPA shall begin to implement and sustain NMFS-approved, safety-net projects. |
NMFS/BPA | Action 177 | NMFS | In 2002, BPA shall begin to implement and sustain NMFS-approved, safety-net projects. |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1992 | Initiated safety net captive broodstock program for the anadromous run of Redfish Lake sockeye salmon. |
1993 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
1993 | Produced adults for restoration of anadromous sockeye salmon runs to Redfish Lake. |
1993 | Refined captive broodstock rearing strategies. |
1994 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
1994 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
1994 | Produced first eyed eggs (n = 48,000) for restoration of anadromous sockeye salmon runs to Redfish Lake. |
1994 | Continued to refine rearing strategies. |
1995 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
1995 | Demonstrated captive broodstock survival is better in well and UV treated seawater than untreated seawater, as well as demonstrating that the age of maturation, size, and fecundity of freshwater and seawater reared captive broodstock was similar. |
1996 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
1996 | Produced 413,600 eyed eggs and 80 prespawning adults for use in restoring anadromous sockeye salmon runs to Redfish Lake. |
1996 | Amplified the captive population over 250 times the number of fish returning to Redfish Lake in 1991. |
1997 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing |
1997 | Produced 168,000 eyed eggs and 40 adults for use in restoring anadromous sockeye salmon runs to Redfish Lake. |
1998 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
1998 | Produced 47,500 eyed eggs for use in restoring anadromous sockeye salmon runs to Redfish Lake. |
1999 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
1999 | Produced 65,400 eyed eggs for use in restoring anadromous sockeye salmon runs to Redfish Lake. |
1999 | Returned 7 anadromous adults to Snake River Basin Lake. |
2000 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
2000 | Produced 95,000 eyed eggs for use in restoring anadromous sockeye salmon runs to Redfish Lake. |
2000 | In collaboration with IDFG program produced 257 returning anadromous adult salmon to Redfish Lake, more than 16 times the number of wild fish returning to the Lake for the entire previous 8 year period. |
2001 | Continued safety net captive broodstock rearing. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
199107200 | Redfish Lake sockeye captive broodstock program | Idaho Department of Fish and Game is also maintaining captive broodstocks for Snake River sockeye salmon to avoid catastrophic loss of the gene pool and for rebuilding efforts. |
199107100 | Snake River sockeye salmon habitat | The Shoshone-Bannock Tribe of Idaho is conducting habitat and limnological research for rebuilding efforts for Snake River sockeye salmon. |
199009300 | Genetic analysis of Oncorhynchus nerka (ESA) | The Univeristy of Idaho has been conducting genetic analyses of Snake River sockeye salmon. |
199305600 | Assessment of captive broodstock technology | Refinement of captive broodstock technology is necessary to maximize potential of captive broodstock recovery programs for ESA-listed stocks of Pacific salmon in the Columbia River Basin. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Rear a safety net captive broodstock program for ESA-listed Snake River sockeye salmon from Redfish Lake (Idaho). | a. Maintain anadromous Redfish Lake sockeye salmon in a saftey net captive broodtock program. | ongoing | $440,000 | |
1. Provide a safety net captive broodstock program for ESA-listed Snake River sockeye salmon from Redfish Lake (Idaho). | b. Secure facility for freshwater phase of Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstock culture. | 1 | $850,000 | |
2. Restore anadromous runs of ESA-listed sockeye salmon to Snake River Basin lakes. | a. Provide prespawning adults, eyed eggs, and juveniles to aid recovery of this ESA-listed stock in Idaho. | ongoing | $200,000 | |
3.Determine the effectiveness of smolt releases for restoring anadromous runs of Snake River sockeye salmon. | a. Evaluate the release to adult survival of the sockeye salmon of smolts from the sockeye salmon captive broodstock released back into the Snake River system. | 8 | $90,000 | |
4. Implement best protocols for rearing anadromous sockeye salmon in captive broodstock programs. | a. Compare alternate rearing protocols. | ongoing | $20,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1. Provide a saftey net captive broodstock program for ESA-listed Snake River sockeye salmon from Redfish Lake (Idaho). | 2003 | 2006 | $1,876,881 |
2. Restore anadromous runs of ESA-listed sockeye salmon to Snake River Basin lakes. | 2003 | 2006 | $949,939 |
3. Determine the effectiveness of smolt releases for restoring anadromous runs of Snake River sockeye salmon. | 2003 | $2,006 | |
397,457 | $2,003 |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
$780,000 | $811,200 | $843,600 | $877,344 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 4.1 | $240,400 |
Fringe | $91,800 | |
Supplies | $263,500 | |
Travel | $26,100 | |
Capital | $870,000 | |
NEPA | $0 | |
PIT tags | # of tags: 0 | $0 |
Subcontractor | $108,200 | |
Other | $0 | |
$1,600,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $1,600,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $1,600,000 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $560,000 |
% change from forecast | 185.7% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
The FY 2002 project cost has risen due to an urgent, but one time only, need to secure a permanent freshwater captive broodstock rearing facility located near the NMFS marine broodstock culture facility in Manchester, Washington. The remainder of the cost increase is due to smolt rearing at ODFW's Bonneville Hatchery, coded wire and PIT tagging smolts, and the ever present inflation.
Reason for change in scope
The new task (2) under objective 1 is to secure a freshwater captive broodstock facility near the marine captive broodstock facilitiy to ensure the continued propogation of ESA-listed Redfish Lake Sockeye Salmon. The new objective (3) is to determine the best release stratergy for ESA-listed captive broodstock to ensure the most efficient restoration of this anadromous Snake River Sockeye Salmon run.
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
NMFS | 1.5 FTE | $135,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Not applicable - no response required
Sep 28, 2001
Comment:
Not applicable. Scientific issues are not central to the decision. This is the NMFS captive rearing program in support of the Stanley Basin sockeye salmon program. The need for this project is integrally linked to that program. Part of the request is to purchase a freshwater hatchery that is presently leased, near Manchester, WA, to support the program. The expectation on behalf of project sponsors is that they will need this facility for the sockeye program during the next decade. Sponsors feel that the property owner can cancel the present leasing arrangement at any time, thus jeopardizing the programComment:
This project is considered a BASE project by NMFS since it contributed to the baseline survival of sockeye salmon during the generation of the Biological Opinion. The NMFS is currently under a lease that has contract language that allows for the lease to be terminated with a 90 day notice, language that subsequently gives the owner flexibility for purposes of selling the property. Presently, the owner of the property is actively marketing the property as "for sale." The property, which has been identified as desirable for development, is located in Kitsap County, one of the fastest growing counties in the Washington. The NMFS conducted a survey of other existing facilities throughout western Washington and identified this site as the most acceptable based on issues such as water availability, water quality, etc. The market analysis by NMFS indicated that the property is worth $850,000 for a lease purpose. Presently, there are no other hatcheries that could provide the facilities required to raise this particular group of fish.Comment:
Not applicable. Scientific issues are not central to the decision. This is the NMFS captive rearing program in support of the Stanley Basin sockeye salmon program. The need for this project is integrally linked to that program. Part of the request is to purchase a freshwater hatchery that is presently leased, near Manchester, WA, to support the program. The expectation on behalf of project sponsors is that they will need this facility for the sockeye program during the next decade. Sponsors feel that the property owner can cancel the present leasing arrangement at any time, thus jeopardizing the program.Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUIncrease abundance of listed sockeye ESU through captive broodstock and artificial propagation.
Comments
This is the NMFS portion of the very important sockeye safety-net. See comments for Project No. 199107200.
Already ESA Req? No
Biop? Yes
Comment:
Recommend as critical to implement RPAs 175 and 177. This project is part of the ongoing artificial propagation safety-net program intended to prevent extinction of Snake River (SR) sockeye salmon. BPA may explore options with the project sponsor for securing this facility for the length of the project. BPA RPA RPM:
175, 177
NMFS RPA/USFWS RPM:
base
Comment:
Comment:
Fund to implement RPA 177. Project sponsor indicated an urgent need to secure a permanent facility. BPA will explore purchase of this facility and other facility options to continue to meet the RPA obligations of this project.Comment:
Captive project: programmatic issue 12. Draft submittal received. Under "Step" review. 05 base increase due to increases in energy/labor. Equipment repair. CAPITAL ELEMENTS?Comment:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$737,242 | $980,000 | $980,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website