FY 2003 Request for Studies proposal 200305400

Contents

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

TitleType
200305400 Narrative, Request for Studies Proposal, "Relative reproductive success of hatchery-origin and wild-origin steelhead spawning naturally in the Hood River" Narrative
FY 2005 Powerpoint Presentation Update for Project 200305400 Powerpoint Presentation
FY 2005 Powerpoint Presentation Update for Project 200305400 Powerpoint Presentation

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleRelative Reproductive Success of Hatchery-Origin and Wild-Origin Steelhead Spawning Naturally in the Hood River
Proposal ID200305400
OrganizationOregon State University (OSU)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameMichael Blouin
Mailing addressDept of Zoology, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331
Phone / email5417372362 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectMichael Blouin
Review cycleFY 2003 Request for Studies
Province / SubbasinColumbia Gorge / Hood
Short descriptionEstimate the reproductive success of hatchery-origin steelhead relative to that of wild-origin steelhead that have been spawning in the Hood River. Estimate this difference using "old" hatchery stock vs. wild, and "new" hatchery stock vs. wild. Do the c
Target speciesSteelhead
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.65 -121.58 Hood River
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA
182

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2003 cost
Personnel Postdoc, technician, PI summer $122,000
Supplies $30,000
Indirect 41.5% $63,000
$215,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost$215,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2003 budget request$215,000
FY 2003 forecast from 2002$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
BPA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
May 14, 2003

Comment:

REVIEW:
BPA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
May 14, 2003

Comment:

REVIEW:
ISRP Final Review (ISRP 2003-9)
Recommendation:
Fundable - high rank
Date:
Jun 27, 2003

Comment:

Fundable, high rank. A response was not needed. If selected for funding the principal investigator should respond to the general ISRP comments in the contracting process. The ISRP ranks this proposal high even though it is not one of the priority ESUs. Preliminary data exist, the information is applicable to other locations, and useful results can be obtained on the fitness of F2 and F3 progeny relatively quickly.
REVIEW:
BPA Funding Decision
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Oct 2, 2003

Comment:

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$215,000 $277,000 $277,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website