FY 2003 Mainstem/Systemwide proposal 200306900
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 35006 Narrative | Narrative |
| 35006 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
| 35006 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Use of Mainstem Habitats by Juvenile Pacific Lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) |
| Proposal ID | 200306900 |
| Organization | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Dennis Dauble |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 999 K6-84 Richland, WA 99352 |
| Phone / email | 5093763631 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Dennis Dauble |
| Review cycle | Mainstem/Systemwide |
| Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / |
| Short description | Characterize the use of mainstem Columbia and lower Snake river habitats by juvenile Pacific lamprey and identify river reaches with high potential for restoration or expanded use. |
| Target species | Juvenile Pacific Lamprey |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| McNary Dam to Wanapum Dam, Columbia River km 460-670; Little Goose to Lower Granite Dam, Snake River km 100-173 | ||
| 46.43 | -119.26 | McNary Dam to Wanapum Dam, Columbia River |
| 46.7 | -117.71 | Little Goose to Lower Granite Dam, Snake River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
| NMFS 155 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| N/A |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 199402600 | Pacific Lamprey Research and Restoration | Collaboration |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Identify habitat use areas for the Hanford Reach | a. Develop sampling design from existing physical data sets | 1 | $11,316 | |
| b. Survey sites using electroshocking equipment | 1 | $75,410 | Yes | |
| c. Analyze data and report | 1 | $14,259 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Identify habitat use areas for tailrace habitats | 2004 | 2004 | $142,066 |
| 2. Identify mainstem habitats with highest potential for restoration | 2005 | 2005 | $90,315 |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
|---|---|
| $142,066 | $90,315 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: .85 | $38,122 |
| Fringe | $9,912 | |
| Supplies | $525 | |
| Travel | $1,349 | |
| Indirect | $51,077 | |
| $100,985 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2003 cost | $100,985 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2003 budget request | $100,985 |
| FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable only if response is adequate
Aug 2, 2002
Comment:
A response is needed. The sponsors propose to investigate utilization of shoreline habitats in riverine sections of the mainstem Columbia and Snake Rivers by juvenile lamprey and use this information to extrapolate habitat use and restoration potential to larger spatial scales. The ISRP believes this research is fundamental to lamprey recovery in the basin. The proposal is well prepared and reflects the input of previous reviews by the working group on lamprey and the previous submission to the FWP. The sponsors are particularly well suited to conduct the research.The research is worthwhile, but more methodological detail is needed. What specific habitat criteria will be used to classify habitats as having high, medium, or low potential for lamprey rearing and spawning (page 6)? How will spawning habitat and its use by adult lamprey be quantified? How large of an area will be sampled at each sampling site? To what water depth will sampling occur? How will abundance be quantified? Describe in more detail how ANOVA will be used to assess relationships between habitat and abundance. Is a multiple regression approach suitable for defining these relationships? Will stratified random sampling be incorporated into the study and, if so, what will be the sampling design?
More detail is needed in characterizing how the landscape scale evaluation will be accomplished. For example, how will the site-specific information gathered in this work be scaled up or linked to the channel and reach level characteristics such as channel form, gradient, and discharge? What are the "geologic features" that will be used to in the landscape-scale extrapolation? How will historical habitats be identified?
Comment:
Project 35008 should be funded first to coordinate lamprey research and monitoring activities, and determine the appropriate sequence for initiating new projects. Funding could be initiated in the outyears.Comment:
Fundable. We disagree with CBFWA's "recommended action" designation and believe the proposal should be higher priority. This research is fundamental to lamprey recovery in the basin, and this project is likely to contribute substantially to understanding mainstem rearing opportunities for juvenile lamprey. The sponsors propose to investigate utilization of shoreline habitats in riverine sections of the mainstem Columbia and Snake Rivers by juvenile lamprey and use this information to extrapolate habitat use and restoration potential to larger spatial scales. The proposal is well prepared and reflects the input of previous reviews by the working group on lamprey and the previous submission to the FWP. The sponsors are particularly well suited to conduct the research. The response adequately addressed the ISRP's concerns about additional methodological detail.If funded, this project should be coordinated with other monitoring projects to ensure compatibility of objectives, common methods, and protocols. This coordination could be accomplished under the favorably reviewed CBFWA proposal #35033.
Comment:
Comments
Not Reviewed
Already ESA Required?
Biop?
No
Comment:
Category:3. Other projects not recommended by staff
Comments: