FY 2003 Mainstem/Systemwide proposal 200303700
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
35039 Narrative | Narrative |
35039 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
35039 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | The influence of hatcheries and their products on the health and physiology of naturally rearing fish |
Proposal ID | 200303700 |
Organization | U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Matthew G. Mesa |
Mailing address | Columbia River Research Laboratory 5501A Cook-Underwood Road Cook, WA 98605 |
Phone / email | 5095382299 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Jim Seelye |
Review cycle | Mainstem/Systemwide |
Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / |
Short description | This research will determine whether standard hatchery or supplementation operations influence the concentration of Renibacterium salmoninarum in streams and subsequently affects the health of naturally-rearing salmonids |
Target species | Spring chinook salmon, steelhead, and other hatchery-reared and wild salmonids |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
47.182 | -120.9798 | Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility, Chinook Way, Cle Elum, WA, 98922 |
45.7225 | -121.5323 | Spring Creek Hatchery Ponds on the Big White Salmon River |
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, 6505 N.E. 65th St., Seattle, WA 98115 | ||
U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia River Research Center, 5501A Cook-Underwood Rd., Cook, WA 98605 |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
184 |
188 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|---|---|---|
NMFS | Action 184 | NMFS | The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for a hatchery research, monitoring, and evaluation program consisting of studies to determine whether hatchery reforms reduce the risk of extinction for Columbia River basin salmonids and whether conservation hatcheries contribute to recovery. |
NMFS/BPA | Action 184 | NMFS | The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for a hatchery research, monitoring, and evaluation program consisting of studies to determine whether hatchery reforms reduce the risk of extinction for Columbia River basin salmonids and whether conservation hatcheries contribute to recovery. |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
200007200 | Heritability of Disease Resistance and Immune Function in Chinook Salmon | Should provide complementary information for optimizing hatchery operations |
199506325 | Yakima Fisheries Monitoring And Evaluation Project | Should provide more direct and complementary information regarding the potential for pathogen transmission from hatchery to wild fish |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Objective 1. Determine if salmonid hatcheries amplify Rs concentrations in effluent water or outfalls and subsequently influence the health of fish residing below the hatchery | 1a. Compare existing and modified methods for detection and quantification of Rs in water samples. | 2-3 | $86,225 | |
1g. Data analysis and reporting | 4 | $5,887 | ||
Objective 2. Determine whether release of hatchery fish from adult females with high Rs antigen levels can infect and ultimately influence the health of fish in the natural environment | 2a. Design and construct artificial streams for hatchery-wild fish pathogen transmission studies | 1 | $164,946 | |
Objective 3. Determine the influence of natural or artificial stocking of adult spring chinook salmon carcasses on Rs concentrations downstream. | 3a. Quantify levels of viable Rs in spring chinook salmon carcasses at spawning and at monthly intervals for 4 months after storage in a hatchery freezer. | 1 | $34,553 | |
3i. Data analysis and reporting | 4 | $11,837 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
Objective 1. | 2004 | 2006 | $895,427 |
Objective 2. | 2004 | 2006 | $766,548 |
Objective 3. | 2004 | 2006 | $410,495 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|
$652,993 | $814,700 | $604,777 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: GS-13/4, 0.35 FTE; GS-7/1, 0.65 FTE; GS-8, 1.8 FTE | $93,556 |
Fringe | $30,025 | |
Supplies | Artificial streams, assay supplies | $75,384 |
Travel | $17,222 | |
Indirect | @ 33.5% | $77,261 |
Subcontractor | $10,000 | |
$303,448 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost | $303,448 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2003 budget request | $303,448 |
FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center | Salaries and benefits (calculated for the duration of the project) | $328,099 | in-kind |
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Olympia and Lower Columbia Fish Health Centers | Salaries and benefits (duration of project) | $160,000 | in-kind |
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife | Salaries and benefits (duration of project) | $20,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable only if response is adequate
Aug 2, 2002
Comment:
This is a well designed program that will address three major issues: do hatcheries amplify the presence of Rs in the wild (water and fish), do hatchery juveniles with high Rs levels pose a risk to wild juveniles (tested in artificial stream tanks), and do carcasses outplanted for nutrient supplementation pose a Rs risk to the natural environment. There are two issues to note: the methodology for detection of Rs in large water samples is uncertain (but expected to be functional within a year), and several aspects of objective 3 depend on the freezing treatment of carcasses. For the latter, if freezing does kill the Rs bacteria then the remainder of objective 3 tasks (3b-3h) will not be conducted (requiring a budget adjustment).It is not certain that the three proposed hatchery sites meet their stated (5) criteria. Added justification of the sites should be provided and the proponents should seek Regional input regarding these sites before implementing the study.
What artificial streams would be used in objective 2? It seems that these are constructed fiberglass raceways but the point is not clearly presented in the proposal.
What will be the statistical methods of analysis?
Action Agency/NMFS RME Group Comments:
HARVEST AND HATCHERY SUBGROUP -- Address critical element of RPA? Not relevant to RPA 182.
This proposal would relate to RPA 184, since hatchery reforms include protocols to reduce disease transmission. Diseased wild fish would be less likely to survive to adult, which would affect the risk of extinction for listed fish.
Relevant to RPA 184 and planning of hatchery reforms. Investigates influence of salmonid hatcheries and hatchery fish on transmission of disease to wild fish. Before the value of a reform can be assessed, the occurrence of the problem needs to be assessed.
Scope? [ESU's covered, Transferability, Species covered] Spring Chinook, steelhead, and other hatchery-reared salmonids. Results generally transferable to other hatcheries and other ESUs, but may be pathogen specific.
Study design adequate, as is, or as may be modified? Studies could also be combined with the heritability studies on disease resistance and immune function, this may also provide information on whether conservation hatchery breeding protocols may affect genetic traits for disease resistance. This affects the degree to which conservation hatcheries may contribute to recovery, at a genetic, in addition to a demographic, level (another topic under RPA 184).
Could this proposal examine other pathogens at the same time?
Comment:
This is a well designed program that will address three major issues: do hatcheries amplify the presence of Rs in the wild (water and fish), do hatchery juveniles with high Rs levels pose a risk to wild juveniles (tested in artificial stream tanks), and do carcasses outplanted for nutrient supplementation pose a Rs risk to the natural environment. There are two issues to note: the methodology for detection of Rs in large water samples is uncertain (but expected to be functional within a year), and several aspects of objective 3 depend on the freezing treatment of carcasses. For the latter, if freezing does kill the Rs bacteria then the remainder of objective 3 tasks (3b-3h) will not be conducted (requiring a budget adjustment).It is not certain that the three proposed hatchery sites meet their stated (5) criteria. Added justification of the sites should be provided and the proponents should seek Regional input regarding these sites before implementing the study.
What artificial streams would be used in objective 2? It seems that these are constructed fiberglass raceways but the point is not clearly presented in the proposal.
What will be the statistical methods of analysis?
Comment:
The budget for this project needs to be closely scrutinized. The carcass portion of the project may be underway through another project or lab. (Check with Susan Gutenberg, Spring Creek Fish Health Center)Comment:
Fundable. We agree with the CBFWA review and High Priority ranking. This is a well-designed program that will address three major issues: 1) do hatcheries amplify the presence of Renibacterium salmoninarum (Rs) in the wild (water and fish); 2) do hatchery juveniles with high Rs levels pose a risk to wild juveniles (tested in artificial stream tanks); and 3) do carcasses outplanted for nutrient supplementation pose a Rs risk to the natural environment. There are two issues to note: the methodology for detection of Rs in large water samples is uncertain (but expected to be functional within a year), and several aspects of objective 3 depend on the freezing treatment of carcasses. For the latter, if freezing does kill the Rs bacteria then the remainder of objective 3 tasks (3b-3h) will not be conducted (requiring a budget adjustment).The response was adequate for both the ISRP and RME concerns. Project sponsors explained the status of developing an Rs detection method and what it will likely be. They provided justification for the tentative choice of hatchery sites and demonstrated how regional input will be used in the choice. They explained the nature of the raceways to be used and indicated their intended methods of statistical analysis.
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological BenefitIndirect biological benefits, assessment of BKD transmission between hatchery and wild fish.
Comments
The results of this analysis of BKD concentrations and transmission could provide important insights that may affect many hatchery programs (and their reforms), and the practice of outplanting carcasses for nutrient enrichment. Could other disease agents be evaluated?
Already ESA Required?
No
Biop?
Yes
NWPPC Funding Recommendation
Fund (Tier 2) - Fund if funding becomes available
Jun 11, 2003
Comment:
Category:2. Projects that Council staff would recommend if funding becomes available
Comments:
Identified as Bi-op critical