FY 2003 Mainstem/Systemwide proposal 200303700

Additional documents

TitleType
35039 Narrative Narrative
35039 Powerpoint Presentation Powerpoint Presentation
35039 Sponsor Response to the ISRP Response

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleThe influence of hatcheries and their products on the health and physiology of naturally rearing fish
Proposal ID200303700
OrganizationU.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameMatthew G. Mesa
Mailing addressColumbia River Research Laboratory 5501A Cook-Underwood Road Cook, WA 98605
Phone / email5095382299 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectJim Seelye
Review cycleMainstem/Systemwide
Province / SubbasinMainstem/Systemwide /
Short descriptionThis research will determine whether standard hatchery or supplementation operations influence the concentration of Renibacterium salmoninarum in streams and subsequently affects the health of naturally-rearing salmonids
Target speciesSpring chinook salmon, steelhead, and other hatchery-reared and wild salmonids
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
47.182 -120.9798 Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility, Chinook Way, Cle Elum, WA, 98922
45.7225 -121.5323 Spring Creek Hatchery Ponds on the Big White Salmon River
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, 6505 N.E. 65th St., Seattle, WA 98115
U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia River Research Center, 5501A Cook-Underwood Rd., Cook, WA 98605
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA
184
188

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription
NMFS Action 184 NMFS The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for a hatchery research, monitoring, and evaluation program consisting of studies to determine whether hatchery reforms reduce the risk of extinction for Columbia River basin salmonids and whether conservation hatcheries contribute to recovery.
NMFS/BPA Action 184 NMFS The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the appropriate level of FCRPS funding for a hatchery research, monitoring, and evaluation program consisting of studies to determine whether hatchery reforms reduce the risk of extinction for Columbia River basin salmonids and whether conservation hatcheries contribute to recovery.

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
200007200 Heritability of Disease Resistance and Immune Function in Chinook Salmon Should provide complementary information for optimizing hatchery operations
199506325 Yakima Fisheries Monitoring And Evaluation Project Should provide more direct and complementary information regarding the potential for pathogen transmission from hatchery to wild fish

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Objective 1. Determine if salmonid hatcheries amplify Rs concentrations in effluent water or outfalls and subsequently influence the health of fish residing below the hatchery 1a. Compare existing and modified methods for detection and quantification of Rs in water samples. 2-3 $86,225
1g. Data analysis and reporting 4 $5,887
Objective 2. Determine whether release of hatchery fish from adult females with high Rs antigen levels can infect and ultimately influence the health of fish in the natural environment 2a. Design and construct artificial streams for hatchery-wild fish pathogen transmission studies 1 $164,946
Objective 3. Determine the influence of natural or artificial stocking of adult spring chinook salmon carcasses on Rs concentrations downstream. 3a. Quantify levels of viable Rs in spring chinook salmon carcasses at spawning and at monthly intervals for 4 months after storage in a hatchery freezer. 1 $34,553
3i. Data analysis and reporting 4 $11,837
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Objective 1. 2004 2006 $895,427
Objective 2. 2004 2006 $766,548
Objective 3. 2004 2006 $410,495
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$652,993$814,700$604,777

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2003 cost
Personnel FTE: GS-13/4, 0.35 FTE; GS-7/1, 0.65 FTE; GS-8, 1.8 FTE $93,556
Fringe $30,025
Supplies Artificial streams, assay supplies $75,384
Travel $17,222
Indirect @ 33.5% $77,261
Subcontractor $10,000
$303,448
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost$303,448
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2003 budget request$303,448
FY 2003 forecast from 2002$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center Salaries and benefits (calculated for the duration of the project) $328,099 in-kind
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Olympia and Lower Columbia Fish Health Centers Salaries and benefits (duration of project) $160,000 in-kind
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Salaries and benefits (duration of project) $20,000 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable only if response is adequate
Date:
Aug 2, 2002

Comment:

This is a well designed program that will address three major issues: do hatcheries amplify the presence of Rs in the wild (water and fish), do hatchery juveniles with high Rs levels pose a risk to wild juveniles (tested in artificial stream tanks), and do carcasses outplanted for nutrient supplementation pose a Rs risk to the natural environment. There are two issues to note: the methodology for detection of Rs in large water samples is uncertain (but expected to be functional within a year), and several aspects of objective 3 depend on the freezing treatment of carcasses. For the latter, if freezing does kill the Rs bacteria then the remainder of objective 3 tasks (3b-3h) will not be conducted (requiring a budget adjustment).

It is not certain that the three proposed hatchery sites meet their stated (5) criteria. Added justification of the sites should be provided and the proponents should seek Regional input regarding these sites before implementing the study.

What artificial streams would be used in objective 2? It seems that these are constructed fiberglass raceways but the point is not clearly presented in the proposal.

What will be the statistical methods of analysis?

Action Agency/NMFS RME Group Comments:

HARVEST AND HATCHERY SUBGROUP -- Address critical element of RPA? Not relevant to RPA 182.

This proposal would relate to RPA 184, since hatchery reforms include protocols to reduce disease transmission. Diseased wild fish would be less likely to survive to adult, which would affect the risk of extinction for listed fish.

Relevant to RPA 184 and planning of hatchery reforms. Investigates influence of salmonid hatcheries and hatchery fish on transmission of disease to wild fish. Before the value of a reform can be assessed, the occurrence of the problem needs to be assessed.

Scope? [ESU's covered, Transferability, Species covered] Spring Chinook, steelhead, and other hatchery-reared salmonids. Results generally transferable to other hatcheries and other ESUs, but may be pathogen specific.

Study design adequate, as is, or as may be modified? Studies could also be combined with the heritability studies on disease resistance and immune function, this may also provide information on whether conservation hatchery breeding protocols may affect genetic traits for disease resistance. This affects the degree to which conservation hatcheries may contribute to recovery, at a genetic, in addition to a demographic, level (another topic under RPA 184).

Could this proposal examine other pathogens at the same time?


Recommendation:
Response required
Date:
Aug 8, 2002

Comment:

This is a well designed program that will address three major issues: do hatcheries amplify the presence of Rs in the wild (water and fish), do hatchery juveniles with high Rs levels pose a risk to wild juveniles (tested in artificial stream tanks), and do carcasses outplanted for nutrient supplementation pose a Rs risk to the natural environment. There are two issues to note: the methodology for detection of Rs in large water samples is uncertain (but expected to be functional within a year), and several aspects of objective 3 depend on the freezing treatment of carcasses. For the latter, if freezing does kill the Rs bacteria then the remainder of objective 3 tasks (3b-3h) will not be conducted (requiring a budget adjustment).

It is not certain that the three proposed hatchery sites meet their stated (5) criteria. Added justification of the sites should be provided and the proponents should seek Regional input regarding these sites before implementing the study.

What artificial streams would be used in objective 2? It seems that these are constructed fiberglass raceways but the point is not clearly presented in the proposal.

What will be the statistical methods of analysis?


Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Oct 24, 2002

Comment:

The budget for this project needs to be closely scrutinized. The carcass portion of the project may be underway through another project or lab. (Check with Susan Gutenberg, Spring Creek Fish Health Center)
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Nov 5, 2002

Comment:

Fundable. We agree with the CBFWA review and High Priority ranking. This is a well-designed program that will address three major issues: 1) do hatcheries amplify the presence of Renibacterium salmoninarum (Rs) in the wild (water and fish); 2) do hatchery juveniles with high Rs levels pose a risk to wild juveniles (tested in artificial stream tanks); and 3) do carcasses outplanted for nutrient supplementation pose a Rs risk to the natural environment. There are two issues to note: the methodology for detection of Rs in large water samples is uncertain (but expected to be functional within a year), and several aspects of objective 3 depend on the freezing treatment of carcasses. For the latter, if freezing does kill the Rs bacteria then the remainder of objective 3 tasks (3b-3h) will not be conducted (requiring a budget adjustment).

The response was adequate for both the ISRP and RME concerns. Project sponsors explained the status of developing an Rs detection method and what it will likely be. They provided justification for the tentative choice of hatchery sites and demonstrated how regional input will be used in the choice. They explained the nature of the raceways to be used and indicated their intended methods of statistical analysis.


Recommendation:
Date:
Jan 21, 2003

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit
Indirect biological benefits, assessment of BKD transmission between hatchery and wild fish.

Comments
The results of this analysis of BKD concentrations and transmission could provide important insights that may affect many hatchery programs (and their reforms), and the practice of outplanting carcasses for nutrient enrichment. Could other disease agents be evaluated?

Already ESA Required?
No

Biop?
Yes


Recommendation:
Fund (Tier 2) - Fund if funding becomes available
Date:
Jun 11, 2003

Comment:

Category:
2. Projects that Council staff would recommend if funding becomes available

Comments:
Identified as Bi-op critical