FY 1999 proposal 9024
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 9024 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Methow Tributaries Fish Passage |
| Proposal ID | 9024 |
| Organization | USDA Forest Service, Okanogan National Forest, Methow Valley Ranger District (USFS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Jennifer Molesworth |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 97 Winthrop, WA 98862 |
| Phone / email | 5099964010 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Mid-Columbia / Methow |
| Short description | Evaluate barriers to fish passage (mainly culverts) in main tributaries tothe Methow River, and prioritize some barriers for removal. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| not applicable |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $4,442 | |
| Supplies | snorkeling gear, flow meter, measure tapes, and miscellaneous | $800 |
| Travel | 15 days of 4-wheel drive truck time | $458 |
| Subcontractor | none | $0 |
| $5,700 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $5,700 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $5,700 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Deep snows and high stream flows could slow inventory start, move project completion back. Project would still be completed in 1999.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Management Issue: Management concern that the USFS should have included this work as part of the original assessment (in-lieu issue).Comment:
In-lieu funding issue. Proposed tasks appear to be "in lieu of other expenditures authorized or required from other entities under other agreements or provisions of law". (Section 4.(h)(10)(A) of PNW Power Act).Comment:
The proposal was not related to the Fish and Wildlife Program. It was a good idea to determine where road crossings are a barrier to bull trout. The ISRP questioned whether BPA should fund this project or the USFS.