FY 1999 proposal 9033
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 9033 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Document Native Trout Populations |
| Proposal ID | 9033 |
| Organization | Washington Trout (WT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Nick Gayeski |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 402 Duvall, WA 98019 |
| Phone / email | 4257881167 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Wind, Little White Salmon, Klickitat |
| Short description | Photo-Document native trout populations in Columbia Basin in WA state and collect tissue samples for DNA analysis. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | Dr. Pat Trotter and 1 field assistant, 92 day field season. Total ~1000 hrs @ $14.00/hr. | $16,000 |
| Fringe | 25% of Salary | $4,000 |
| Supplies | Film&processing, vials, anesthetic, preservatives, logbooks | $1,600 |
| Travel | Mileage, food, lodging, pack-trips | $14,680 |
| Indirect | Administrative, overhead. | $6,820 |
| Subcontractor | $5,000 | |
| Other | $4,200 | |
| $52,300 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $52,300 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $52,300 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Weather may alter start and/or finish date of field work. This contingency is factored into the timeline: a 92 day field season is given a 150 day window.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Presentation: The sponsor did not give a presentation.Questions/Comments:
Where will the FY 99 work be conducted? In the Pend Oreille watershed?
This work is a small piece of many other ongoing projects including the Joint Stock Assessment (9700400, 9095, and 9156)
Where in region are they planning to survey?
This is another genetics study with $5,000 in lab costs. This seems low. The proponent will do it.
Does this meet the screening requirements? It addresses a general measure of program (watershed projects).
Didn't we fund this last month for FY 98? Yes.
Is Dr. Trotter integrated with WDFW basin work? WDFW has had discussions but have not started work yet.
How will this work benefit fish in long run? By documenting fish presence/absence.
Screening Criteria: Yes
Technical Criteria: Yes
Programmatic Criteria: Yes
General Comment: Projects 9033, 9095, and 9156 appear to overlap and need better coordination.
Comment:
Comment:
This proposal addresses trout populations in the Wind, Big White Salmon, Little White Salmon, and Klickitat subbasins. It is well written and is for much needed basic distributional work. Electrofishing could be risky with at-risk stocks, and fly-fishing catch-and-release mortality can be high; thus, alternative passive survey procedures such as snorkeling should be considered. The DNA analysis to identify hybridization looks good. It is a big drawback that the proposal describes little attempt at collaboration with others, yet coordination, especially with 9405400, is needed.