Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Reduce Sediment Delivery From Kline Mountain Road to the S.F. Salmon River. |
Proposal ID | 9034 |
Organization | USDA Forest Service, Boise National Forest, Cascade Ranger District (USFS, BNF, Cascade RD) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Jennie Fischer |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 696 Cascade, ID 83611 |
Phone / email | 2083827452 / |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Salmon |
Short description |
Reduce sediment along, #474 Road, by utilizing the most cost effecive methods, while keeping the road open to the public. Obilterate the bypass road and restore the wetland. Stabilize and perform minor reconstruction improvements along the #427 Road. . |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
|
n/a |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
Contract prep & administration, planting |
$33,545 |
Supplies |
Native vegetation, road closure signs |
$955 |
Subcontractor |
USFS; Contractors |
$272,542 |
| $307,042 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $307,042 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $307,042 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints:
Contract preparation and awarding process by the USFS is the largest constraint.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision*
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Benefits appear very small – explain how much sediment is there and where it comes from compared to the total South Fork Salmon River sedimentation load? Management Issue: Management flag – is this an "in lieu" issue (is the USFS responsible for this funding)?
Technical Issue: Proposal needs significant modification to clearly describe how the techniques are valid and appropriate to achieve the objectives, and the specific fish and wildlife benefit.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
In-lieu funding issue. Proposed tasks appear to be "in lieu of other expenditures authorized or required from other entities under other agreements or provisions of law". (Section 4.(h)(10)(A) of PNW Power Act).
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
There is not adequate justification of programmatic need in this proposal. Monitoring is not adequately described nor is the reduction of sediment input. This is an appeal to BPA to reduce sediment delivery from Forest Service roads. Is BPA the appropriate funding source for this road improvement?