Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Central Oregon Watershed Enhancement and Outreach |
| Proposal ID | 9040 |
| Organization | Oregon State University Extension Service (OSU Ext) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Michael Stoltz |
| Mailing address | 102 Ballard Hall, OSU Corvallis, OR 97331 |
| Phone / email | 5417372711 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Deschutes |
| Short description | Educate agriculture producers, natural resource managers, area youth about potential to improve watersheds. Set up irrigation demonstrations & a research project on western juniper impacts on watersheds; develop/disseminate the information. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$75,685 |
| Fringe |
|
$4,200 |
| Supplies |
|
$27,500 |
| Operating |
|
$6,425 |
| Capital |
|
$4,000 |
| Travel |
|
$27,022 |
| Indirect |
|
$34,801 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| Other |
|
$26,598 |
| $206,231 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $206,231 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $206,231 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
urgent. Proposed activities would not produce significant near-term survival improvement nor risk a lost opportunity within the next 1-3 years.In-lieu funding issue. Proposed tasks appear to be "in lieu of other expenditures authorized or required from other entities under other agreements or provisions of law". (Section 4.(h)(10)(A) of PNW Power Act).
Budget constraints. Proposal was found to be technically sound and appropriate but was deferred because other work was judged more urgent and funds were not adequate for all needed work.
Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This project has worthy goals: controlling juniper and educating irrigators and youth on the importance of water conservation. The relationship to the Fish and Wildlife Program is not given. The proposal does not provide guarantees that water saved would go to instream use for fish and wildlife.