FY 1999 proposal 9062
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
9062 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Sandy River Delta Riparian Reforestation |
Proposal ID | 9062 |
Organization | USDA Forest Service, Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area (USFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Virginia Kelly |
Mailing address | 902 Wasco Ave, Suite 200 Hood River, OR 97031 |
Phone / email | 5413862333 / |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Sandy |
Short description | Restore 250 acres of rare Columbia River floodplain ‘gallery’ riparian forest (dense, unbroken stands of black cottonwood, willow, ash). Reforestation will improve habitat for riparian forest species. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $2,000 | |
Subcontractor | $19,500 | |
$21,500 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $21,500 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $21,500 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Management Issue: Note that this is wildlife mitigation below Bonneville Dam.Comment:
Comment:
The proposal is well presented, advances significant cost-sharing and has clear matches between budget, personnel, scheduling, objectives, and tasks. The ISRP review team notes, however, that there is little justification provided for the work other than a decline in USFS funding. Reviewers comment that much preliminary work has already been done, and they commend the preparation of a watershed analysis.