FY 1999 proposal 9101
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 9101 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Restore Upper Toppenish Creek Watershed |
| Proposal ID | 9101 |
| Organization | Yakama Indian Nation (YIN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Lynn Hatcher, Fisheries Program Manager |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
| Short description | Moderate flow regime in Toppenish Creek by increasing the retentiveness of natural soil water storage areas, such as headwater meadows and floodplains, following prioritized plan generated by FY98 analysis. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9603501 | Satus Watershed Restoration Project | Restoration in the Toppenish watershed will be an extension of activities undertaken in the Satus watershed. |
| 9206200 | Lower Yakima Valley Wetlands and Riparian Area Restoration Project | Habitat acquisition and restoration along lower Toppenish Creek is complementary with restoration in the upper watershed. |
| 5512000 | Toppenish-Simcoe Instream Flow Restoration | Restoration in the upper watershed will support efforts to restore instream flows. |
| Upper Toppenish Watershed Analysis | Assuming funding in FY 98, this project will provide the restoration plan for the upper Toppenish watershed. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | Includes 3 professional staff (1.1FTE), 5 technicians (1.25 FTE), 1 bookkeeper(0.1 FTE) | $96,492 |
| Fringe | 25.3% | $19,483 |
| Supplies | Office supplies, herbicide, prescribed burning, erosion control, tools, etc. | $18,661 |
| Operating | Portable office rent, utilities, vehicles, fuel, repairs, insurance. | $21,576 |
| Travel | symposia, professional presentations | $4,000 |
| Indirect | 23.5% | $39,121 |
| Subcontractor | $4,100 | |
| Other | $21,642 | |
| $225,075 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $225,075 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $225,075 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Weather is the major constraint on operations. Winter conditions can inhibit access over primitive roads or in stream channels. The length of the season for propagating vegetation is limited by duration of soil moisture
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Comment:
Fund only the completion of the assessment for nowComment:
They should include measurement of peak and base flows in their monitoring efforts since their improvement is a goal of the project. The proposal does not clarify how the land management practices that caused the degradation will be corrected. The survey work already funded has not been completed.