Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Development of a Cowlitz Watershed Management Plan |
| Proposal ID | 9127 |
| Organization | Sustainable Fisheries Foundation |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Cleveland Steward |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 206 Bothell, WA 98041-0206 |
| Phone / email | 4256703584 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Cowlitz |
| Short description | Convene a Watershed Council representing a wide range of public values and interests, and local, state, federal, and tribal entities, to develop an Aquatic Resource Management Plan for the Cowlitz River Watershed. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Supplies |
|
$5,000 |
| Travel |
|
$5,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$3,000 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$40,000 |
| Other |
|
$5,000 |
| $58,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $58,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $58,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: N/A
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Need to describe the coordination with project 9088.Technical Issue: Provide a brief explanation about the Sustainable Fisheries Foundation.
Technical Issue: Unclear if the target is a management plan for the entire Cowlitz or individual watersheds within the Cowlitz.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
urgent. Proposed activities would not produce significant near-term survival improvement nor risk a lost opportunity within the next 1-3 years.Questionable management value. Proposal was either incomplete but did not provide adequate information to determine whether management criteria were met or complete but did not meet critical management criteria.
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
ISRP reviewers commend this proposal as well prepared and impressively stated. It is a good effort to systematically address preparation of a Cowlitz plan, although (1) the one-year effort may be overly ambitious for a very modest budget and (2) an analysis of the apparent failure of earlier efforts would be helpful. Links with the Fish and Wildlife Program, the watershed, and watershed councils are well defined, along with tasks and objectives.