Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Evaluate Fall Chinook & Chum Spawning, Production & Habitat Use in Col R |
Proposal ID | 9131 |
Organization | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Joe Hymer |
Mailing address | 2108 Grand Blvd. Vancouver, WA 98661 |
Phone / email | 3609066740 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Survey the mainstem Columbia below The Dalles, John Day, and McNary dams to locate and quantify mainstem spawning populations of fall chinook… |
Target species | Fall chinook and chum |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$21,038 |
Fringe |
|
$5,259 |
Supplies |
|
$4,000 |
Operating |
|
$5,900 |
Travel |
|
$5,867 |
Indirect |
|
$13,881 |
Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $55,945 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $55,945 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $55,945 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Lack of an adequate flow range for calibrating hydraulic models, low numbers of returning fish might preclude development of habitat suitability criteria.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Incomplete: No time line given for objectives 19-21. However, it seems possible to complete this analysis within the time frame allotted
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Need better explanation of how this proposal is linked to other proposals.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Budget incorporated into 9105
Recommendation:
Inadequate (see 9105 above)
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The ISRP considers the proposal incomplete. Reviewers view the proposal deficient in justifying the work, even while they consider the objectives potentially of value. They recommend that this proposal be made part of Proposal Number 9105. Panel members commend the need to conduct studies in an average water year following the high water years of 1996 and 1997.