Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Produce Watershed Analysis Procedure for Salmon Habitat Restoration |
| Proposal ID | 9142 |
| Organization | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Dale McCullough |
| Mailing address | 729 NE Oregon St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97232 |
| Phone / email | 5032380667 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Create a standardized design and methodology for watershed analyses specifically oriented toward salmon restoration project development. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$77,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$24,255 |
| Supplies |
|
$3,300 |
| Travel |
|
$4,200 |
| Indirect |
|
$40,131 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $148,886 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $148,886 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $148,886 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Management Issue: Explain how this project is not redundant with other established procedures (e.g., Forest Service (ICEBMP), WDFW, GWEB).Technical Issue: Explain how the costs are not excessive for the expected results.
Technical Issue: More clearly describe how this process will address existing deficiencies in watershed analysis procedures.
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Pending
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a well-documented and well-written proposal that ranked in the lower midrange of proposals in this set. It is connected to the Fish and Wildlife Program, Return to the River, Upstream, CBFWA, etc. Watershed analysis as a science is in a developmental phase; thus, investing money to analyze the methods is needed. This proposal does not specifically describe the current watershed analysis methods and frameworks, and it should. It is not clear that a separate standard guide for the Fish and Wildlife Program projects is needed, but it may be.