Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Evaluate Disease Interactions Between Wild and Hatchery Salmonids |
| Proposal ID | 9143 |
| Organization | Oregon State University, Department of Microbiology (OSU) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Dr. Linda M. Bootland |
| Mailing address | Rm 528 Nash Hall, Dept. Microbiolgy, Oregon State Univ. Corvallis,OR 97331 |
| Phone / email | 5417371860 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | This research addresses the role disease plays in the survival of wild salmon and whether hatchery fish negatively impact wild fish either directly, by transmitting pathogens and disease, or indirectly, by reducing the fitness of wild fish. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
Bootland $27,756, Bartholomew $12,336, RA @.33 FTE $15,688, 2 RA $52,308 |
$108,088 |
| Fringe |
@41% to 51% |
$49,623 |
| Supplies |
PCR reagents, tissue culture reagents, ELISA kits, plasticware |
$24,000 |
| Travel |
local travel to collection sites, partial travel to one national meeting for each PI |
$3,000 |
| Indirect |
@42.5% |
$84,877 |
| Subcontractor |
USFWS |
$15,000 |
| $284,588 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $284,588 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $284,588 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Pending
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposal is adequate and ranked in the upper midrange of the set. It has good planned collaboration and well-referenced science. The OSU facilities are especially good. However, the problem is not well defined and thus the need for the work is not persuasively stated. The proposal needs to better describe which pathogens and diseases would be studied (list differs between survey and challenges).