Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Evaluate the Status of Columbia River Sea-Run Cutthroat Trout |
| Proposal ID | 9145 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Mark Zimmerman/David Ward |
| Mailing address | 17330 SE Evelyn St. Clackamas, OR 97015 |
| Phone / email | 5036572000 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Hood, Wind |
| Short description | Survey Columbia River tributaries above and below Bonneville Dam to determine status of sea-run cutthroat trout and identify limiting factors and anthropogenic impacts. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
PEM-D @ 2months, NRS-3 @ 8 months, EBA @ 12 months |
$53,040 |
| Fringe |
@ 41% |
$21,746 |
| Supplies |
backpack shockers, computer, snorkeling equipment, cell phone, field supplies |
$19,700 |
| Operating |
|
$1,440 |
| Travel |
12 months rent @ $230, and 20,000 miles @ $0.16 |
$5,960 |
| Indirect |
Administrative overhead at 22.9% |
$20,538 |
| Subcontractor |
U.S.G.S. Biological Resources Division; Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife |
$142,540 |
| $264,964 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $264,964 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $264,964 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Pending - need to compare proposal to work that might already have been completed
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
Notwithstanding that ISRP reviewers suggest that BPA carefully examine the budget for FY 1999 budget for Objective 1 and a portion of Objective 2, they view this as a clearly stated effort to perform valuable and timely assessments of declining Lower Columbia coastal stocks. They view as adequate the presentation on study background and methods, but invite greater detail. They suggest the proposal is too non-specific on streams the sponsors intend to sample and survey, and recommend that they concentrate on sea-run cutthroat above Bonneville Dam.