FY 1999 proposal 198332300

Additional documents

TitleType
198332300 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleMonitor Smolts at the Head of Lower Granite Reservoir and Lower Granite Dam
Proposal ID198332300
OrganizationIdaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameEdwin Buettner
Mailing address1540 Warner Ave. Lewiston, ID 83501
Phone / email2087993475 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinMainstem / Mainstem
Short descriptionOperate fish traps; monitor migration timing and relative passage index; PIT tag groups of smolts to provide in-season travel time and survival information, including collection of data required for BiOP implementation and decision path determinations.
Target speciesSnake River spring, summer, and fall chinook salmon and summer steelhead trout.
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8712700 NWPPC Slt Monitoring by non-Federal entities Key Component: This project provides in-season management information for flow and passage management
9403300 Fish Passage Center Key Component: Provides in-season management information to FPC for flow and passage management
9107300 IDFG 'Idaho Natural Produciton Monitoring/Evaluation' Key Component: Uses project data to generate estimates of survival from point of release to head of L Granite pool
9008000 PSMFC Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System Key Component: Provide PIT Tag information to PTAGIS on a daily basis during outmigration. Idaho Representative to PIT Tag Steering Committee.
9701000 BPA Essential M&E Infrastructure-PIT Tag Monitor Procurement and Inst. Key Component: Idaho Representative to the ISO Transition Planning Team
8740100 USGS Travel time and Survival Smolt Physiology Key Component: Provide PIT-tagged sample fish

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $160,800
Fringe $51,700
Operating $129,200
Capital Includes two PIT tagging laptop computers needed because of ISO transition @ $2,500 ea $10,000
Tag 20,000 $58,000
Travel $6,000
Subcontractor $0
$415,700
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$415,700
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$415,700
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

ISRP reviewers have some reservations. While the monitoring program is considered valid, the proposal is not well written, and the project’s longevity is challenged. Collectively, the reviewers suggest that the Council consider a broad review of smolt monitoring.