FY 1999 proposal 198343500
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198343500 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Operate and Maintain Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities |
Proposal ID | 198343500 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Gary James |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801 |
Phone / email | 5412764109 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Walla Walla |
Short description | Acclimate juvenile salmon and steelhead prior to release into the Umatilla River Basin. Collect, hold and spawn summer steelhead, coho and chinook salmon and provide eggs to ODFW and other hatcheries for incubation, rearing |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $274,023 | |
Fringe | $76,727 | |
Supplies | $55,720 | |
Operating | $149,410 | |
Travel | $30,270 | |
Indirect | $199,291 | |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
$785,441 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $785,441 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $785,441 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None identified.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Comment:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposal needed more specific results in the history section. Have the facilities achieved their goal? What are the goals? This proposal needed to be better edited. The ISRP would have preferred an experiment that more carefully compared the survival of supplemented salmon to the survival of naturally produced salmon.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$1,018,147 | $1,018,147 | $1,018,147 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website