FY 1999 proposal 198805305
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | NE Oregon Hatchery Master Plan and Facilities - ODFW |
| Proposal ID | 198805305 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | James V. Phelps |
| Mailing address | 107 20th St. La Grande, OR 97850 |
| Phone / email | 5419632138 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Grande Ronde |
| Short description | Develop the Walla Walla, Grande Ronde, and Imnaha Master Plans. Develop facility designs and costs with schedule for implementation. Construct and operate new facilities as agreed between comanagers; initially, operate for Captive and Endemic Brood. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 8805301 |
NE Oregon Outplanting Facility Master Plan |
Nez Perce comanagement, Lostine River. |
| 8805302 |
NE Oregon Hatchery - Grande Ronde Satellite Facilities |
CTUIR comanagement on upper Grande Ronde River and Catherine Creek. |
| 9202604 |
Spring Chinook Salmon Early Life History |
Grande Ronde Basin early life history M&E. |
| 9604400 |
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood Capitol Construction |
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood Capitol Construction |
| 9801001 |
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood O&M, M&E, Fish Health Monit |
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Brood O&M, M&E, Fish Health Monitoring. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$82,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$29,500 |
| Supplies |
|
$24,000 |
| Operating |
|
$47,000 |
| Capital |
|
$41,000 |
| Travel |
|
$17,800 |
| Indirect |
|
$45,900 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $287,200 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $287,200 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $287,200 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Minor corrections needed. Not enough detail to determine if resources are enough or appropriate in order to accomplish project. No data on past costs are included. A very long list of personnel is included but no information of FTE amounts for each person is included. The proposal also needs to include qualifications statements for key personnel.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Reduce time for review and planning (obj.2 and 6)
Recommendation:
Grande Ronde NEOH - Inadequate as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is in part a proposal to construct satellite hatchery facilities and ponds. The proposal does not describe how broodstock will be mined, which is a risky endeavor. The proposal does not adequately describe the relation of the work to the other Grande Ronde NEOH facilities. The methods should give assurance that the remaining population will not be harmed by the proposed activities, but they do not.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $69,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website