FY 1999 proposal 198902401
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Evaluate Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla |
Proposal ID | 198902401 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Richard Carmichael |
Mailing address | 211 Inlow Hall, EOU, 1410 āLā Avenue La Grande, OR 97850 |
Phone / email | 5419623777 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Umatilla |
Short description | Determine migration patterns, evaluate health, estimate abundance and survival of outmigrating juvenile salmonids in the Umatilla River; investigate effect of environmental variables on fish migration and video-document passage at Three Mile Falls Dam. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
9000500 |
Umatilla Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation - hatchery effectiveness |
Migration monitoring provides data on in-basin migration success of different rearing/release strategies |
8343600 |
Umatilla Passage O&M -passage facility O&M |
Study results provide information on juvenile fish passage problems at Three Mile Falls Dam |
9000501 |
Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation - natural production success |
Lower river monitoring provides information on species life history, abundance, survival; supplements PIT tagging of natural steelhead. |
88022 |
Umatilla River Basin Trap and Haul Program-collect/transport juvenile fish |
Sampling at Westland Canal trap provides species composition and weight data for transport operations |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$94,867 |
Fringe |
|
$34,152 |
Supplies |
|
$1,000 |
Operating |
|
$8,791 |
Travel |
|
$4,160 |
Indirect |
|
$32,740 |
Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $175,710 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $175,710 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $175,710 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Time required to complete annual progress report for 1998 and final completion report for project years 1994 - 1998 may extend date beyond 9/1999.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Same as original FY98 proposal ā need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Funding increase described in the proposal revision
Recommendation:
Adequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal included a good explanation of hypotheses, assumptions and products. However, hypothesis three is inadequate, and technical justification is weak. The proposal referred extensively to other documents but did not give a complete explanation of why we need to know about juvenile migration and what problem will it solve. The project should be coordinated with Umatilla satellite facility project 8343500. Four years most likely will not provide enough time to develop a solid database and draw conclusions. The study should extend one generation beyond the February 1996 flood. Publication of results should include more than just an annual report.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$306,235 |
$306,235 |
$306,235 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website