FY 1999 proposal 198909800
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 198909800 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers |
| Proposal ID | 198909800 |
| Organization | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Peter F. Hassemer |
| Mailing address | Idaho Dept. of Fish and Game, 1414 East Locust Lane Nampa, ID 83686 |
| Phone / email | 2084658404 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Salmon, Clearwater |
| Short description | Evaluate various supplementation strategies for maintaining and rebuilding spring/summer chinook populations in Idaho. Develop recommendations for the use of supplementation to rebuild naturally spawning populations. |
| Target species | Spring/summer chinook salmon |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $370,000 | |
| Fringe | $138,000 | |
| Supplies | $17,200 | |
| Operating | $85,800 | |
| Capital | $50,000 | |
| Tag | $43,500 | |
| Travel | $36,000 | |
| Indirect | $150,399 | |
| Subcontractor | $0 | |
| Other | $15,600 | |
| $906,499 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $906,499 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $906,499 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: The continued decline of spring/summer chinook salmon returning to Idaho resulting in insufficient adult returns to provide target supplementation treatments.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Comment:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Inadequate proposals, adequate purpose
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
These are a series of proposals [198909800, 198909801, 198909802, 198909803] from NPT, IDFG, the Sho-Ban Tribe, and USFWS. The proposals are for important research with desirable objectives. However, the proposals do not adequately describe experimental design and methods to ensure that the studies will achieve scientifically sound results. Although the proposals state that lengthy reports justify the experimental design, the important aspects of the design, why they were chosen, and their strengths and limitations should be summarized in the proposals. Otherwise, the technical soundness of the work cannot be evaluated. This project is over eight years old, but the progress and results to date are not adequately described. Reviewers wondered whether the small numbers of returning fish would allow the objectives of the work to be accomplished. Careful design of experiments and analyses might minimize these sorts of problems.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $990,000 | $990,000 | $990,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website