FY 1999 proposal 198910800
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Monitor and Evaluate Modeling Support |
Proposal ID | 198910800 |
Organization | University of Washington (UW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | James J. Anderson |
Mailing address | 1325 - 4th Ave., Suite 1820 Seattle, WA 98101 |
Phone / email | 2065424772 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Mainstem |
Short description | Provide analytical tools and databases required to evaluate the effectiveness of hydrosystem operations and other mitigation measures for improved fish survival as required to meet obligations of the ESA, NEPA, and NW Power Act. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$224,806 |
Fringe |
|
$51,390 |
Supplies |
|
$9,092 |
Operating |
|
$19,904 |
Capital |
|
$20,410 |
Travel |
|
$1,750 |
Indirect |
|
$79,594 |
Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
Other |
|
$4,710 |
| $411,656 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $411,656 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $411,656 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes: I guess
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes: A bit high in $?
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Duplicates 9700200
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is an adequate proposal even though it does not relate its work to the Fish and Wildlife Program. It ranked in the midrange of proposals in the set. The project objectives appear very productive and provocative and include successful tech transfer via the worldwide web. The proposal claims that the model incorporates about everything. But how? The history and background are good (but more a statement of accomplishment than need for more work). Why model, why integrate? It is surprising that the proposal does not explicitly link it to other Fish and Wildlife Program projects, since it is one of the main integrating projects in the Fish and Wildlife Program. The proposal needs to be coordinated with 8910800, 9601900 and 9018 by the same principal investigator. It appears he is well over 100% committed if all the work is funded; thus, other personnel need to be identified.