FY 1999 proposal 199007700
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Northern Squawfish Management Program |
Proposal ID | 199007700 |
Organization | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Russell Porter |
Mailing address | 45 SE 82nd Dr., Suite 100 Gladstone, OR 97027-2522 |
Phone / email | 5036505400 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Mainstem / Mainstem |
Short description | Reduce juvenile salmonid predation by selective reduction of northern squawfish populations in the lower mainstem Columbia and Snake Rivers by means of a sport-reward fishery, dam angling and site-specific tributary mouth fisheries. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$1,290,711 |
Fringe |
|
$424,743 |
Supplies |
|
$49,232 |
Operating |
|
$168,378 |
Travel |
Mileage, Per Diem & GSA Vehicle Lease costs |
$254,940 |
Indirect |
|
$428,013 |
Subcontractor |
Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife; Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority; Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife; Columbia River Intertribal Fish Commission; Yakama Indian Nation; Nez Perce Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation |
$0 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
Other |
|
$1,012,000 |
| $10,712,017 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $10,712,017 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $10,712,017 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Schedule changes are minor, but are related to yearly flow rates and termperatures in the river which affect northern squawfish availability to anglers and spawning time. Biological Opinion guidelines may affect program duration or start date.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The scientific basis and logical need for this proposal are questionable. The proposal does not, for example, ensure that adequate time will be invested to critically assess whether predator control is effective in significantly reducing mortality of juveniles or increasing adult returns.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$2,050,000 |
$3,770,000 |
$3,770,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website