FY 1999 proposal 199106100
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | WDFW Projects |
Proposal ID | 199106100 |
Organization | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | |
Mailing address | |
Phone / email | / |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
Short description | |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $0 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $0 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $0 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Submitted to BPA as part of project 9609400.
Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
Although the purpose is appropriate, this is an inadequate proposal that ranked near the bottom of the set. The proposal writers should have described the enhancement activities. There should be better monitoring of biodiversity and wildlife populations. There is little technical content to review. The project history section takes a project-by-project approach that should be used in the methods section. There are many subprojects that could be better described. This is clearly inadequate documentation for the expenditure of over $3 million/year. Why are there significant indirect costs in the budget, when a substantial amount of the budget is for land acquisition? This financial aspect needs review beyond the ISRP. (9106100)
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$0 |
$265,137 |
$265,137 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website