FY 1999 proposal 199204000
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Redfish Lake Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Rearing and Research |
| Proposal ID | 199204000 |
| Organization | National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Tom Flagg |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 130 Manchester, WA 98353 |
| Phone / email | 2069427181 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | Incubate and rear Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstocks. Provide pre-spawning adults, eyed eggs, and juveniles to aid recovery of this ESA-listed endangered stock in Idaho. |
| Target species | ESA-listed Snake River sockeye salmon |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9107200 |
Redfish Lake sockeye captive broodstock program |
Idaho Department of Fish and Game is also maintaining captive broodstocks for Snake River sockeye salmon to avoid catastrophic loss of the gene pool and for rebuilding efforts |
| 9107100 |
Snake River sockeye salmon habitat |
The Shoshone-Bannock Tribe of Idaho is conducting habitat and limnological research for rebuilding efforts for Snake River sockeye salmon |
| 9009300 |
Genetic analysis of Oncorhynchus nerke (ESA) |
The University of Idaho has been conducting genetic analyses of Snake River sockeye salmon |
| 9305600 |
Assessment of captive broodstock technology |
Refinement of captive broodstock technology is necessary to maximize potential of captive broodstock recovery programs for ESA-listed stocks of Pacific salmon in the Columbia River Basin |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$146,200 |
| Fringe |
|
$47,100 |
| Supplies |
|
$125,400 |
| Travel |
|
$20,800 |
| Indirect |
|
$80,200 |
| Subcontractor |
N/A |
$80,300 |
| $500,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $500,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $500,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Schedule may be constrained by population viability of ESA-listed stocks in this recovery program. If population numbers are still low by the year 2001, then captive broodstocks may have to be continued to protect the gene pools.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal addresses a critical situation, as very few sockeye have returned to Redfish Lake in recent years. The size of the remaining fish population constrains what can be done, and it may be too late for captive broodstock to be effective. Nevertheless, the attempt to preserve the stock is warranted.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $737,242 |
$980,000 |
$980,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website