FY 1999 proposal 199206801

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
199206801 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Implementation of Willamette Basin Mitigation Program--Watershed
Proposal ID	199206801
Organization	Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Gregory B. Sieglitz
Mailing address	7118 NE Vandenberg Ave. Corvallis, OR 97330
Phone / email	5417574186 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Columbia / Willamette
Short description	Mitigate for hydro-electric facilities through enhancement, easement development, acquisition, restoration, and management of wetlands and other target habitat types and their respective species in the Willamette basin in Oregon.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$100,000
Fringe		$38,000
Supplies		$60,000
Operating		$2,000
Capital		$170,000
Travel		$10,000
Indirect		$20,000
Subcontractor		$100,000
		$500,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$500,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$500,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Delayed and inadequate funding to implement projects within the scheduled time periods Severe weather conditions which could delay field activities Unexpected difficulties with the negotiation efforts with landowners

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Do Not Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Project withdrawn by sponsor - duplication

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Wildlife Review Comments

Recommendation:
withdrawn

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

The project sponsor withdrew this project from consideration. It is an exact duplication of recommended project 9206800, Implementation of Willamette Basin Mitigation Program-Wildlife.

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal lacks detail on the properties to be enhanced and is very vague. The proposal creates the impression that so far, work has been all planning and no implementation. This project should be better linked to 9206800. The proposal needs better reference points for monitoring. BPA should look at the budget; the total proposed seems like a large amount to spend for planning alone.