FY 1999 proposal 199401806
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Enhance Habitat For Spring & Fall Chinook, Summer Steelhead and Bulltrout |
| Proposal ID | 199401806 |
| Organization | Columbia Conservation District (CCD) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Terry Bruegman |
| Mailing address | 202 South Second Street Dayton, WA 99328-1327 |
| Phone / email | 5093824773 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Tucannon |
| Short description | Restore, protect, and enhance fish habitat, riparian, and upland areas using bio-engineering technology to reduce stream temperature, sedimentation, geomorphic and stream bank instability while increasing pool density and habitat complexity. |
| Target species | Spring Chinook, Fall Chinook, summer Steelhead and Bulltrout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9202602 |
Implement Eastern Wa Model Watershed Plans |
Technical Lead facilitates habitat restoration in the T&E fall and spring chinook and steelhead waters of the Tucannon River Watershed. Facilitates community-wide participation and inter-agency cooperation in habitat restoration activities. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
Project administration is 6% of budget |
$0 |
| Operating |
|
$69,000 |
| Subcontractor |
WDFW - Snake River Laboratory; WSU - Center for Environmental Education; Salmon Corps at Nez Perce |
$45,000 |
| Other |
|
$1,186,000 |
| Other |
|
$1,186,000 |
| Other |
|
$1,186,000 |
| $3,672,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $3,672,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $3,672,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Committed long-term funding and cooperation for salmonid habitat restoration and protection is critical for the partnership between landowners and agencies to successfully implement the watershed management plan.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Explain if the big cost increase from FY98 is from the added M&E objective.Technical Issue: Describe the specific projects at specific locations (especially the Meander project), and describe why these are the most critical projects to conduct.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Absorbs part of 9202602
Recommendation:
Adequate after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is the best among three habitat enhancement proposals for this subbasin. The monitoring program is well described.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $318,417 |
$318,417 |
$318,417 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website