FY 1999 proposal 199500900
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199500900 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Volunteers Rear 500,000 Net Pen Rainbow Trout Above Grand Coulee Dam |
| Proposal ID | 199500900 |
| Organization | Lake Roosevelt Development Association (LRDA) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Gene Smith |
| Mailing address | Rt 1 Box 67-F Davenport, WA 99122 |
| Phone / email | 5097258416 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Upper Columbia Mainstem |
| Short description | Enhance the harvest of rainbow in waters above Grand Coulee Dam by rearing 500,000 net pen Rbt with the cooperation of volunteers |
| Target species | rainbow trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9104600 | Spokane Tribal Hatchery | source of net pen Rbt |
| 9404300 | Lake Roosevelt Monitoring | tagging/monitoring/creel counts |
| 9104700 | Sherman Creek Hatchery | source of Rbt |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | coordinator and secy/treas | $45,000 |
| Fringe | $7,430 | |
| Supplies | office supplies, telephone, insurance | $7,800 |
| Operating | build/repair/replace pens | $28,120 |
| Capital | truck lease | $10,000 |
| Travel | mileage/lodging/meals | $1,425 |
| Subcontractor | $0 | |
| $99,775 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $99,775 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $99,775 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: changes in biological objectives for fish production
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Presentation: This project is truly a grassroots volunteer effort that has grown in size. We have 51 volunteers (average age 70) who work with CCT, ST and WDFW. The volunteers build and maintain 43 rainbow trout net pens spread over a 96-mile area. We also have 6 kokanee net pens at Kettle Falls. BPA provides funding for coordination. The goal is to produce 500,000 rainbow trout in pens to increase the target harvest to 190,000 fish. Last year's 82 foot drawdown caused a problem for the fish: we were constantly moving and re-anchoringQuestions/Answers:
What is the catch rate? Answer: In 1997 it was 100,000 –200,000 out of a 500,000 release. We met the objective of 180,000 fish harvested.
Can net pen rainbows be increasing fishing pressure on wild (San Poil) stocks by drawing fishermen to lake? Answer: The native population is limited to the San Poil River and is protected by fishing regulations. The net pen trout do not go up the San Poil River.
Can you mobilize the volunteers to build net pens for kokanee? Answer: We could use the volunteers if the kokanee were localized in larger pens. But there are regulations about how many fish the pens can hold. The 9 existing net pens are very spread out now. The nutrients from the net pens would add to system.
Screening Criteria: Yes
Technical Criteria: Yes
Programmatic Criteria: Yes
Comment:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Lake Roosevelt Hatchery Proposals - Inadequate as a set
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is for work that is not well linked to the other mitigation programs. The assumption that a harvest of 180,000 can be produced from 500,000 fish is not technically justified in the proposal, and plans to assess and avoid ecosystem-level effects of net pens are not given. BPA should look at the budget.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $114,889 | $114,889 | $114,889 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website