FY 1999 proposal 199503300
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199503300 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | O&M of Yakima Fish Protection, Mitigation & Enhancement Facilities |
| Proposal ID | 199503300 |
| Organization | U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Jim Faith |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 1749 Yakima, WA 98907-1749 |
| Phone / email | 5095755848 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
| Short description | Provide for operation & maintenance of BPA owned anadromous fish protective and trapping facilities within the Yakima River Basin. Facilities include several irrigation diversion fish screens and one major adult fish trapping complex. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Supplies | $20,000 | |
| Operating | $185,000 | |
| Subcontractor | $15,000 | |
| $220,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $220,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $220,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: There are currently 23 BPA owned Yakima Phase II fish facilities under the custody of Reclamation, with 6 additional sites scheduled for construction completion during 1998. This may increase to 60 or more when Phase II construction is complete in approximately the year 2003, depending on the timing and level of construction funding provided by BPA. The actual O&M work schedule and associated costs will depend on the rate that these facilities are brought on-line.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Comment:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
YKFP Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposal lacks adequate description of past and future work. This may be a necessary project, but the proposal does not convey the need.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $110,551 | $100,551 | $100,551 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website