FY 1999 proposal 199506800
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199506800 Narrative | Narrative |
| Columbia Gorge: Klickitat Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
| Columbia Gorge: Klickitat Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Klickitat Passage/Habitat Improvement M&E |
| Proposal ID | 199506800 |
| Organization | Yakama Indian Nation Fisheries Program (YIN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Mel Sampson |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Klickitat |
| Short description | Integrated watershed anaylsis to produce information that identifies passage, habitat improvements oppurtunities and supplememntation strategies within basin.Test new supplementation techniques to increase natural production, harvest and genetic fitness. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 8812001 | Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Management | Core Management/Admin. Support services for all YIN's YKFP Tasks |
| 8811500 | Fisheries Technician Field Activites | Manpower support during peak field periods |
| 5512800 | Lower Klickitat River Riparian and In-Channel Habitat | Conduct riparian restoration in Swale Creek (tributary to Klickitat River). Develop public relations with local community |
| 9506300 | Yakima/Klickitat M&E Program | Covers the diverse M&E needs for the target species which are essential for the success of the YKFP |
| 5512700 | Klickitat Basin Culvert Rehabiliitation | Passage witnin tributaries is essential for natuiral restortartion of species |
| 5512600 | Upper Klickitat Meadows Riparian Restoatrion | Contributes to improving prime habitat which is vital for success of supplentattion implementation |
| 9506800 | Klickitat/Habitat Preliminary Design Project O&M | Redesign and contruction modifications to mainstem passage facilitities on the Klickitat River. |
| 9506402 | Project #9506402, Upper Yakima species interaction studies. | Incorporate ideas, procedures, and successes into future Klickitat River supplementation activities. |
| 9506404 | Policy and technical involvement and planning, YKFP. | The Policy Group must approve directs habitat/passage improvements and future supplementation activities to be developed under this project before they can be implemented. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | Assume additional manpower support from YIN Tech pool BPA # 8811500 | $292,700 |
| Fringe | 20 % | $58,540 |
| Supplies | estimated | $15,000 |
| Operating | estiamted | $5,000 |
| Capital | estimated | $15,000 |
| Travel | estimated | $5,000 |
| Indirect | 26.6 % | $102,739 |
| Subcontractor | Summit Technology; International Statistical Training and Technical Services; Mobrand Biometrics | $30,000 |
| Other | $50,000 | |
| Other | $50,000 | |
| Other | $50,000 | |
| $673,979 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $673,979 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $673,979 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Continuation of field sampling to more accurately indicate overall survival of each individual stocks throughout life history. Continuation of critical engineering work to better use Mitchell Act available funds to defrey BPA costs. BPA budgeting
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Return to Sponsor for Revision*
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Need to clearly describe what work is going on in FY98, and what specifically is going to be done in FY99 (new activities).Technical Issue: How does budget increase from FY98 relate to FY99 work and funding?
Technical Issue: Page 11 of the proposal (steps 1-5) seems to indicate the logical sequence of needs and actions and this needs to be more clearly threaded through the proposal (formatting problem).
Technical Issue: Proposal needs significant modification to clearly describe how the techniques are valid and appropriate to achieve the objectives, and the specific fish and wildlife benefit.
Comment:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The technical justification is too vague. The general description of YKFP is good. It was difficult to determine whether this is a project to implement watershed analysis or a supplementation project. The proposal’s integration with other YKFP projects is well done. The earlier completion of the watershed analysis is a positive feature, but the proposal gives no interpretation or summary of the results of that analysis. The proposal gives no indication how the watershed analysis affects management decisions. How will the fish be sampled? How will the fishways be improved? The objectives in section 7.b are not consistent with objectives stated elsewhere.Comment:
Project authorized for 233 and then big capital component. Master plan developed for Step review. 04 is for NEPA and design work and upgrades. 05 would be construction of Lyle brood and hatchery upgrades, on/off site acclimation construction. CapitalComment:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
capital
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $4,784,650 | $0 | $0 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website