FY 1999 proposal 199600800
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | PATH-Participation by State and Tribal Agencies |
| Proposal ID | 199600800 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Dr. Howard Schaller |
| Mailing address | 2501 SW First Ave. Portland, OR 97207 |
| Phone / email | 5038725252 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Test hypotheses underlying key salmon recovery management decisions, develop decision analysis to evaluate alternative management strategies, and assist in designing research, monitoring and adaptive management experiments. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9600600 |
PATH, Facilitation, Tech Assistance & Peer Review |
work with planning group to develop specific PATH workplans and reports to be submitted to PATH peer review process, coordinate independent scientists work plan. |
| 9203200 |
USFS modeling support |
PATH scientific support |
| 9303701 |
Simulation Modeling Participation C. Paulsen |
PATH scientific support |
| 9601700 |
Hydrosystem Work Particiption A. Giorgi |
PATH scientific support |
| 8910800 |
Modeling PATH/ BPA technical support J. Anderson |
PATH scientific support |
|
PATH Participation NMFS |
PATH scientific support |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
NRS4 10 mos, NRS3 6mos, NRS1 6mos, Manager 3 mos, Office Asst. 3mos |
$107,342 |
| Fringe |
41% of salary |
$44,010 |
| Supplies |
Computer Software
Miscellanous |
$2,258 |
| Operating |
Communications
Computer Lease |
$4,200 |
| Travel |
air fare, per diem, lodging, Mileage & Parking for workgroups and workshops |
$4,425 |
| Indirect |
22.9% |
$37,152 |
| Subcontractor |
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority; Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; US Fish and Wildlife Service |
$498,750 |
| $698,137 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $698,137 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $698,137 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Schedule and objective are prioritized by needs for NMFS 1999 decision on the FCRPS Biological Opinion. The schedules may change due to the number of alternative management options that are fowarded for evaluation.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a well-written proposal that is well coordinated with other PATH proposals and studies. It ranked near the top of the set.