FY 1999 proposal 199604300
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation Enhancement - O&M and M&E |
| Proposal ID | 199604300 |
| Organization | Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | John S. Gebhards |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 1942 McCall, ID 83638 |
| Phone / email | 2086345290 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | Develop native chinook broodstock for rearing in Nature's concept production program & release of smolts to recover Johnson Creek summer chinook population, with utilization of on-site adult collection/holding & juvenile rearing/acclimation. |
| Target species | Snake River summer chinook salmon |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$270,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$60,000 |
| Supplies |
|
$100,000 |
| Operating |
|
$150,000 |
| Capital |
|
$450,000 |
| Tag |
|
$52,200 |
| Travel |
|
$63,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$140,000 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$14,800 |
| $1,300,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,300,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,300,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Availability of salmon for supplementation in 1999 may change the focus of the project to a captive brood stock program instead of supplementation project. Completion of NEPA analysis and ESA requirements is expected in 1998, but could extend into 1999. Completion of NPPC 3-step review/approval process could cause delays in final design and construction of necessary facilities. Final design and construction should begin in 1998 and be completed in 1999 or 2000. However, the availability of qualified engineering design firms and construction firms could set design and construction time lines back into 2000 or 2001.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Clarify budget - Planning 120k, Interagency coord. 260k, Report 65k.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is to build a new facility for collecting and raising new broodstock (a small-scale production initiative), but it does not give adequate justification of the need for this activity. The proposal does not adequately describe or justify the methods to be used, though it states that NATURE’s technology will be used and evaluated. Likely effectiveness of supplementation is not well addressed, though the five-generation supplementation timeframe is consistent with RASP guidelines.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $923,887 |
$923,887 |
$923,887 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website