FY 1999 proposal 199607704
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199607704 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Final Design for Fish Passage Improvements at Lower Eldorado Falls |
| Proposal ID | 199607704 |
| Organization | Nez Perce Tribal Fisheries/Watershed Management Program (NPT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Ira Jones |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540 |
| Phone / email | 2088437406 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Clearwater |
| Short description | FINAL DESIGN OF LOWER ELDORADO FALLS TO IMPROVE FISH PASSAGE, WORKING WITHIN AN OVERALL WATERSHED APPROACH, IS THE MAIN GOAL OF THIS PROJECT. THE PROJECT WILL COMPLETE ALL PRE-CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. |
| Target species | Coho, Fall Chinook, Lamprey Steelhead, Resident Fish (Bull Trout, Cut Throat) |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 83350 | Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery | Lower Eldorado Falls fish passage improvements for anadromous fish outplants to spawning and rearing habitat. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $5,173 | |
| Fringe | $1,811 | |
| Supplies | $480 | |
| Travel | $792 | |
| Indirect | $2,561 | |
| Subcontractor | Clearwater National Forest; Consulting Engineer | $6,408 |
| Other | $577 | |
| Other | $577 | |
| Other | $577 | |
| Other | $577 | |
| $19,533 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $19,533 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $19,533 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: The tentative schedules for this project proposal may change due to the availability of the consulting engineers and to weather conditions, if further surveying is found needed. Any in-stream work will be constrained by the fish window for spawning.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Return to Sponsor for Revision
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Same as original FY98 proposal – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, with a focus on new work for FY99.Technical Issue: Explain if the work was to be completed in FY98 and whether the FY99 proposal is for new work.
Comment:
Comment:
The goals of this proposal are not scientifically sound. The proposal is for work that would introduce non-native species, by opening the way for anadromous fishes to invade an area where they did not naturally occur, but where westslope cutthroat trout (and undoubtedly other fauna) do occur. Such efforts have become a controversial issue. The probable effects of anadromous invasion on the native biota should be discussed in the proposal.