FY 1999 proposal 199607705
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Restore Mccomas Meadows |
| Proposal ID | 199607705 |
| Organization | Nez Perce Tribal Fisheries/Watershed (NPT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Ira Jones |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540 |
| Phone / email | 2088437406 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Clearwater |
| Short description | RESTORING THE MEADOW CREEK (MCCOMAS MEADOWS) WITHIN THE CLEARWATER SUBBASIN IS THE OVERALL GOAL OF THIS PROJECT. WE WILL ACHIEVE THIS WORKING WITHIN AN OVERALL WATERSHED APPROACH, COMPLETING FOUR OBJECTIVES WITHIN THE MEADOW. |
| Target species | Fall Chinook Salmon, Steelhead, Resident Fish |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9607701 |
McComas Meadows-Nez Perce National Forest |
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) |
| 9607700 |
Clearwater Focus Watershed |
Co-coordinators with the Nez Perce Tribe and the State of Idaho. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$52,640 |
| Fringe |
|
$6,947 |
| Supplies |
|
$3,670 |
| Operating |
all O & M is included within the other catergories included in the budget proposal. |
$0 |
| Travel |
|
$10,100 |
| Indirect |
|
$22,658 |
| Subcontractor |
Nez Perce National Forest; Earth Conservation Corp.- Salmon Corp.-Nez Perce |
$23,100 |
| Other |
|
$4,438 |
| Other |
|
$4,438 |
| $127,991 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $127,991 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $127,991 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: EXISTING SCHEDULES FOR THE 1999 BUDGET YEAR MAY CHANGE DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS. ALL ON-THE-GROUND PROJECTS OCCUR IN A MOUNTAINOUS AREA 2500 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL, WHERE UNPREDICTABLE WEATHER PATTERNS MAY OCCUR
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Management Issue: Management flag – concerned about the "in-lieu" issue and the delegation of funding responsibility. The Forest Service should be contributing more of the cost share.Technical Issue: Explain why a nursery needs constructed in order to revegetate the meadow.
Technical Issue: Explain how this project is coordinated with other projects in the watershed.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Inadequate after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is unclear. It does not adequately describe the history of the project and the area. The proposal is for stream protection along with planting of riparian vegetation. Although the proposal states that grazing has been removed for ten years, it does not adequately describe what is causing the current problems. In particular, if livestock have been excluded, one would expect that ample vegetation should regenerate. The proposal does not demonstrate that planting is needed. The proposal also is vague on habitat improvement methods, and the horticultural center is not described in enough detail. The budget is not adequately explained and should be analyzed by BPA ($525,553 (1997-2003) to treat only 2.5 miles of stream)
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $320,987 |
$320,987 |
$320,987 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website