FY 1999 proposal 199608300

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
199608300 Narrative	Narrative
199608300 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Upper Grande Ronde Habitat Enhancement
Proposal ID	199608300
Organization	Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Allen Childs
Mailing address	P.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97850
Phone / email	5412785267 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Snake / Grande Ronde
Short description	Continue with the McCoy Meadows Meadow Restoration Project located on a private ranch in the McCoy and Meadow Creek subwatersheds and the multi-year project devoped by CTUIR, ODFW, NRCS, USFS and landowners along the Grande Ronde River.
Target species	Snake River Spring chinook salmon and summer steelhead trout

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$36,995
Fringe		$10,729
Supplies		$51,700
Operating		$4,700
Travel		$4,082
Indirect		$36,794
Subcontractor		$55,000
		$200,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$200,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$200,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Explain how this project is differentiated from FY98 work.

Technical Issue: Resubmit the proposal with specific projects for 99 based on approved 98 funding.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Was 9128

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose after revision

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

(previously 9128) The original proposal is not clear. Technical justification is inadequate and objectives and planned activities are vague. The description of monitoring is inadequate, and the proposal lacks criteria with which to measure the project’s success. The revised proposal did a better job detailing the location of the project but otherwise did not improve significantly from the original.

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$190,000	$190,000	$190,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website