FY 1999 proposal 199700300

Additional documents

TitleType
199700300 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleBox Canyon Watershed Project
Proposal ID199700300
OrganizationKalispel Tribe of Indians (KNRD)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameGregory S. Olenik
Mailing addressP.O. Box 39 Usk, WA 99180
Phone / email5094451147 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinUpper Columbia / Pend Oreille
Short descriptionCompliment efforts of the Kalispel Resident Fish Project through protection and enhancement of upland areas in a target watershed.
Target speciesbull trout (proposed ESA listing) westslope cutthroat trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9500100 Kalispel Tribe Resident Fish Complimentary
9700400 Resident Fish Stock Status Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams Complimentary
9106000 Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife Mitigation Project Wildlife habitat improvement on adjacent land
9106001 Pend Oreille Wetlands II Wildlife habitat improvement on adjacent land

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $30,371
Fringe 33% $10,022
Supplies $5,091
Travel $5,500
Indirect 28.7% $16,825
Subcontractor $0
Other $3,000
$70,809
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$70,809
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$70,809
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: It is impossible to identify all constraints and problems that may occur. While we will make every attempt to stay on schedule, unforseen assignments, bad weather, equipment failure, etc. will delay progress.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision*
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Basically the same as the FY98 proposal – need to provide an explanation of work that was funded in FY98 plus new work in FY99 dependent on FY98 funding.

Technical Issue: Proposal needs significant modification to clearly describe how the techniques are valid and appropriate to achieve the objectives, and the specific fish and wildlife benefit.


Recommendation:
Fundable
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Presentation: This is a pilot project to facilitate work in other tributaries and coordinate assessments and implementation throughout the Pend Oreille subbasin. It is complimentary to the Kalispel Resident Fish Project (9500100) in that it focuses on upland areas while 9500100 focuses on riparian areas. Sedimentation could be a limiting factor. The project promotes grass roots communication and networking between landowners, private parties, the Forest Service, and WDFW. Through this communication, costs-sharing is part of the project development.

Questions/Answers:

What on-the-ground work will be conducted? Answer: We are currently doing the leg-work and contacting and coordinating with the land owners.

What are the target species? Answer: Bull trout and cutthroat trout. The project focuses on the upland where problems start instead of on the streams where problems show up.

Screening Criteria: Yes

Technical Criteria: Yes

Programmatic Criteria: Yes


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a proposal to fund a watershed analysis, but it does not provide adequate technical justification for the work. There is little description of methods or monitoring. The proposed analysis appears to be a good idea, but the proposal does not ensure that it will be done well.