FY 1999 proposal 199700300
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199700300 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Box Canyon Watershed Project |
Proposal ID | 199700300 |
Organization | Kalispel Tribe of Indians (KNRD) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Gregory S. Olenik |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 39 Usk, WA 99180 |
Phone / email | 5094451147 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Pend Oreille |
Short description | Compliment efforts of the Kalispel Resident Fish Project through protection and enhancement of upland areas in a target watershed. |
Target species | bull trout (proposed ESA listing) westslope cutthroat trout |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9500100 | Kalispel Tribe Resident Fish | Complimentary |
9700400 | Resident Fish Stock Status Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams | Complimentary |
9106000 | Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife Mitigation Project | Wildlife habitat improvement on adjacent land |
9106001 | Pend Oreille Wetlands II | Wildlife habitat improvement on adjacent land |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $30,371 | |
Fringe | 33% | $10,022 |
Supplies | $5,091 | |
Travel | $5,500 | |
Indirect | 28.7% | $16,825 |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
Other | $3,000 | |
$70,809 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $70,809 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $70,809 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: It is impossible to identify all constraints and problems that may occur. While we will make every attempt to stay on schedule, unforseen assignments, bad weather, equipment failure, etc. will delay progress.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Return to Sponsor for Revision*
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Basically the same as the FY98 proposal – need to provide an explanation of work that was funded in FY98 plus new work in FY99 dependent on FY98 funding.Technical Issue: Proposal needs significant modification to clearly describe how the techniques are valid and appropriate to achieve the objectives, and the specific fish and wildlife benefit.
Comment:
Presentation: This is a pilot project to facilitate work in other tributaries and coordinate assessments and implementation throughout the Pend Oreille subbasin. It is complimentary to the Kalispel Resident Fish Project (9500100) in that it focuses on upland areas while 9500100 focuses on riparian areas. Sedimentation could be a limiting factor. The project promotes grass roots communication and networking between landowners, private parties, the Forest Service, and WDFW. Through this communication, costs-sharing is part of the project development.Questions/Answers:
What on-the-ground work will be conducted? Answer: We are currently doing the leg-work and contacting and coordinating with the land owners.
What are the target species? Answer: Bull trout and cutthroat trout. The project focuses on the upland where problems start instead of on the streams where problems show up.
Screening Criteria: Yes
Technical Criteria: Yes
Programmatic Criteria: Yes
Comment:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a proposal to fund a watershed analysis, but it does not provide adequate technical justification for the work. There is little description of methods or monitoring. The proposed analysis appears to be a good idea, but the proposal does not ensure that it will be done well.