FY 1999 proposal 199703400
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199703400 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Monitor Fine Sediment and Overwinter Sedimentation in John Day & Gr Ronde |
Proposal ID | 199703400 |
Organization | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Jon Rhodes |
Mailing address | 729 NE Oregon St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97232 |
Phone / email | 5037311307 / |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / John Day |
Short description | For 5 years, annually monitor surface fine sediment and overwinter sedimentation in cleaned gravels in spawning habitats in the Grande Ronde and North Fork John Day Rivers, analyze potential trends, investigate potential relationships data, and relateā¦ |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $9,194 | |
Fringe | $2,896 | |
Supplies | $74 | |
Operating | $524 | |
Travel | $1,850 | |
Indirect | $5,482 | |
Subcontractor | $10,046 | |
$30,066 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $30,066 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $30,066 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: High flows or late snowfall may cause seasonal delays in sample retrievals in some years.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Return to Sponsor for Revision
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: The proposal was corrected for the final FY98 review, and those corrections are not in the FY99 proposal. If the additional information is provided as it was in 98, will have technical merit and feasibility.Comment:
Comment:
This proposal is very well done. Is 5 years adequate to establish a statistical baseline? The project should include the design of a monitoring plan to cover a broad area if a relationship between surface fines and redd sedimentation is confirmed. The proposal referenced a Chapman paper but did not appear to take concerns raised in that paper into full account.