FY 1999 proposal 199800100
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199800100 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Analytical Support-PATH and ESA Biological Assessments |
| Proposal ID | 199800100 |
| Organization | Hinrichsen Environmental Services (HES) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Richard A. Hinrichsen |
| Mailing address | 302 NE 45th St., Suite B Seattle, WA 98105 |
| Phone / email | 2066335725 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Formulate alternative hypotheses, provide biological rationale, and develop and test model structures to identify key uncertainties in salmon and steelhead life-cycle survival processes.. |
| Target species | spring/summer chinook, fall chinook, steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9600600 | PATH - FACILITATION, TECH ASSISTANCE & PEER REVIEW | Provide alternative hypothesis for PATH decision analysis, peer review of analytic methods |
| 9600800 | PATH (PLAN FOR ANALYZING AND TESTING HYPOTHESES) - PARTICIPATION | Work with state agencies and tribes to develop retrospective and prospective analyses under PATH. Assist with peer review. |
| 9700200 | PATH -- UW TECHNICAL SUPPORT | Develop alternative hypotheses for use in PATH. Provide biological rationale for alternative hyptheses.r |
| 9601700 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR PATH - CHAPMAN CONSULTING, INC.(NOW BIOANAL | Recommend data of opportunity and areas of data scrutiny necessary for development of alternative models. |
| 9303701 | TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH THE LIFE CYCLE MODEL | Develop and implement analytical methods for analyzing life-cycle data |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | Hinrichsen at $75/hour for 1,306 hours | $97,950 |
| Travel | Workshop and meeting attendance for PATH | $2,000 |
| Subcontractor | Evans-Hamilton | $19,950 |
| $119,900 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $119,900 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $119,900 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Comment:
Comment:
This proposal is well written, referenced and technically adequate. It is integrated with PATH. The objectives, tasks and hypotheses are good. However, there is no indication of what climate data will be used and how it will be analyzed. It ranked in the middle top of the set. It gives no clear hypotheses other than regime scale forcing, and the methods are somewhat vague (what data?).